Exceed the boundary of the development plan

  • Erstellt am 2014-12-07 00:00:21

Renozz.84

2014-12-07 00:00:21
  • #1
Hello,

this concerns a building permit application that was rejected. The reason given is that the house would fit on the plot, but the boundary of the local development plan would cut through the building footprint of the house. This means that part of the plot is not designated as building land. This is not about a rear extension, but facing the street towards the edge of the village.

What options are there to proceed here? Is it advisable to involve a lawyer at this stage? Are there any court rulings known where, for example, it was approved that 40% of the building footprint of the house may exceed the development boundary?
 

ypg

2014-12-07 00:48:30
  • #2
Why was the limit exceeded in the application?

Regards Yvonne
 

toxicmolotof

2014-12-07 10:17:38
  • #3
What success do you expect by forcing it when everyone else had to adhere to it before?

Such a building boundary once made sense and as long as that purpose is not outdated, I see little success at least.

I would first find out why it is the way it is.
 

Renozz.84

2014-12-07 22:14:14
  • #4
Good evening,

after reviewing the drawing attached to the development plan again, the boundary clearly runs around the property.
In cadastral maps, the area marked in red (from the development plan) is not designated as building land. So what is actually decisive as the valid development boundary?
Background:
The property has been in the family for quite some time, so no one can trace how and why it is this way. It was once said that boundary stones were misplaced, but you can't really argue that anywhere, anyone could come up with that...

Would be grateful for tips!
 

E.Curb

2014-12-08 11:38:42
  • #5
I don't quite understand. Where exactly is a building supposed to be put now?
 

DG

2014-12-08 21:28:08
  • #6
Hello Renozz,

one would need to obtain all plans for the property, including the correct development plan, if there is one, and also the Bodenrichtwertkarte (!) - that can be worth its weight in gold in your case.

If there is a cadastral error, it can usually be checked as well, the effort is usually manageable, at least regarding the question of whether an error exists. Who has to correct a possible error is another matter.

In NRW, this would probably be solved with a Verzichtsbaulast, i.e., you move out of the building zone at one point and compensate by giving up area within the remaining building zone, which may no longer be developed in the future. This ensures that the developable area remains the same, but deviation from the norm is still possible.

So there are options/possibilities, but you have to look at it in detail.

Best regards
Dirk Grafe
 

Similar topics
28.08.2013Separate land and generate building land? Where to inquire?14
21.01.2015Extending building land around garden land - Effects on building envelope20
10.08.2016Property with adjacent private forest area22
21.11.2016Buy land as land with development potential15
29.12.2016Private road = Building land? Who pays which share?21
12.04.2017Standard land value and hillside property11
31.07.2017Large plot, additional planting opportunities available - Investor?13
22.09.2017Pre-contract - provider offers financing and land11
28.06.2018Clearing building land for sale or offering it below value?25
20.01.2021Optimal subdivision of a plot and conversion into building land20
24.11.2021Plot of land in sight - looking for tips, tricks, suggestions39
03.06.2021Property purchased - start construction planning before handover?11
13.08.2021Land in the outer area - Is it worth objecting?26
19.07.2021What did you pay for your property?61
20.07.2021Conversion of outdoor area into building land - possibilities25
11.09.2021Outdoor area/flood zone to building land? (Lower Saxony)20
25.11.2021Brokerage Contract Agricultural Land18
10.04.2022Construction project on hold - keep the property or sell it?25
22.05.2023Agricultural land expected for commercial use - long narrow plot19
09.09.2023Supplementary statute for building land valid only for one buyer11

Oben