Energy storage

Somewhere the provider has to realize their profit, and that can always only be the customer/consumer.

The solutions offer virtually no added value, but they seem to work well for the providers. Not a bad business model for the provider...

Will definitely be sold net :cool: EDIT: I read that the providers often go bankrupt but ...Psss, don’t tell anyone.

It does not seem to be ideal. Nevertheless, it can be assumed that the electricity price will continue to rise in the future and that one will receive less and less for feeding in.

is getting less and less for feeding in.

Only those who are just installing a photovoltaic system on the roof. However, storage units are expected to become significantly cheaper in the coming years. Then you can also do without the cloud.

it doesn't seem to be the best. Nevertheless, it can be assumed that the electricity price will continue to rise in the future and that one will receive less and less for feeding in.

Certainly in the future. However, you secure the conditions at the "start time" for the next 20 years ...!?

Regardless of the simplified calculations of the cloud sellers (I also had various versions calculated Senec, Sonnen, EON), which are usually, including Senec - somewhat inaccurate on a monthly basis, the cascade switching has proven to be the most useful, as I can cover a large part of my winter consumption cheaply without being tied to a provider (with reservation of the battery charge for Hamburg consumption). In the end, the cloud has to beat a kWh price of ~12 ct (GG WP meter costs 5€, summer surplus brings 8 ct, so I effectively pay 12 ct (out of 20) in winter).

An hourly calculation model helped me with the decision.