Electricity surcharge: curse or blessing for the electricity price?

  • Erstellt am 2024-07-10 11:59:00

AndreasRK

2024-07-10 11:59:00
  • #1
Hello everyone,

I recently read about the planned electricity levy, which was introduced by the Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs, under the leadership of Robert Habeck. It seems that the idea is to redistribute the costs of network charges, which have so far been borne by consumers, onto the levy. This is supposed to relieve electricity prices, especially for private households. However, I wonder whether this measure will actually have the desired effect or whether it is only a short-term solution that could cause other difficulties in the long run? What do you think, is the electricity levy more of a curse or a blessing for our electricity price? What experiences have you had so far when similar measures were taken? Looking forward to your opinions!

Best regards!
 

Buchsbaum066

2024-07-10 13:02:37
  • #2
The infrastructure in Germany is hopelessly outdated and completely run down. The power grids are not able to cope with the new conditions. According to various opinions, the expansion of the grid is supposed to cost around 700 billion. Without a drastic increase in grid fees, i.e. ultimately in the electricity price, this cannot be financed.

No one should fool themselves about that. We also have enormous cost increases for fossil fuels. Now some people might say that this is not true at all. Maybe not at the moment. But what if our American friends, with a D. Trump as the new president, will no longer be so friendly to us.

Rising electricity price ahead.

I read today that VW alone has 400 billion in debts on its balance sheet. That is gigantic.

Today I am not sure whether the German industry will survive the shortage of raw materials and cheap energy as well as the lack of innovative power.

The expansion of solar energy currently often fails due to a lack of grid capacity. I was at a farmer’s place a few days ago. He wanted to have a 100 kWp system installed on his roof. It doesn’t work because there is no feed-in point for this capacity. A maximum of 30 kWp is possible and even then he still has to lay 300 m of underground cable.
 

rick2018

2024-07-10 13:13:48
  • #3
It will not get cheaper. That should be clear to everyone. This is the price you pay when trying to save the world. However, we cannot do it alone… Energy will continue to become more expensive. Therefore, the only help is to consume less and, if possible, [Photovoltaik].
 

nordanney

2024-07-10 13:31:15
  • #4
And is that relevant to the high electricity costs? And what do the 400 billion actually mean – what kind of debts are they (much comes from the financial sector, VW is very strong in leasing and car financing – corresponding loan agreements and inflows are opposite that)? After all, there is also 200 billion in equity and 27 billion profit in 2023. If anything, don’t just throw in numbers unrelated to the topic without any evaluation. Oh yes. By the way, Apple also has about 300 billion in debt, but only 62 billion in equity. So Apple is actually much worse off than VW. Or maybe not? It doesn’t matter at all what politics come up with to finance the urgently needed grid expansion. There is no way around the fact that it will become more expensive for the consumer. That’s how it is.
 

MachsSelbst

2024-07-11 17:09:44
  • #5
Yep. But above all, the Boomer generation has to take the blame for that. At the latest in the 90s, the renovation of bridges, routes, etc. should have been started. That didn’t happen. Now we have the mess because we don’t have the capacity to handle thousands of projects simultaneously. But you really can’t blame the generation of Habeck and Baerbock (and me) for that. Because "we" are now tackling all of that which "you" have neglected all these years...
 

rick2018

2024-07-11 21:07:34
  • #6
The problem is that much has been sunk into social issues or elsewhere in the world. If, for example, the vehicle tax were used for a specific purpose, we would have the best roads… We have a spending problem. We cannot afford the welfare state in its current form. But many want the state to regulate everything and take responsibility for everything. The political attempt to force people into e-mobility and heat pumps can be blamed on the current government.
 

Similar topics
30.04.2012No equity, good income, financing feasible?22
08.12.2014Smaller photovoltaic system 2 KWp11
18.03.2015Buying property feasible - Loan with building savings as equity?12
02.02.2016It doesn't work without equity - experience!109
18.07.2017Network expansion cable network pay privately?22
21.02.2018Economic efficiency of a 10-kWp system vs. a 5-kWp system11
30.08.2018Operating data of a 10 kWp system. Exchange of various data15
06.02.2020Energy "concept" for old farmhouse30
09.05.2020Photovoltaic system: How much kWp is sufficient for a house?81
29.03.2020Commissioning of 9.3 kWp system combined with air-to-water heat pump and controlled residential ventilation10
13.03.2021Single-family house financing €950,000; loan amount €750,000, equity €200,00079
30.03.20229.2 kWP system - size of the battery storage?11
11.04.2022House construction 2024, affordable with little equity?75
18.12.2024Construction financing without equity as an option?162
18.11.2022Air heat pump electricity price increased as of January 1, 202239
30.01.20231483€ per kWp | CanadianSolar 11.48 kWp and SMA inverters47
07.03.2023Dream of building a house 2025/26 realistic? Currently hardly any equity, but we are fighting!52
22.02.2024Heat pumps require a lot of energy and make noise73
07.03.2025Current installation costs of a heat pump58
06.01.2025Is the photovoltaic price okay? 10.2 kWp and 5 kWh storage14

Oben