Earthworks in the construction performance description

No matter how you plan, if the property space is enough for me to temporarily store the excavation, it has to be removed.

Then he must go. Everything is always individual. Or, to be a bit Marxist on the evening of the Hessen election. The truth is always concrete. K.

It probably looks worse as a pile than when it is actually spread out evenly. For a 10x10m house footprint without a basement, the mentioned 40cm of topsoil applies, so about 40 cubic meters, plus the trench around the foundation, another 0.5m deep, 1m wide, 40m long (4x10m), which makes another 20 cubic meters. Part of this can possibly be reused to backfill the construction space, so in the end it is about 50 cubic meters.

Spread around the house: most plots will still have 300sqm available: that makes 17cm of soil cover. It always depends on the local conditions, but one should calmly first check whether the expensive disposal can perhaps be avoided.

I don't quite understand the calculation, but whatever: a pile of earth definitely has much more volume than the excavated foundation pit... and then the pile counts in cubic meters, not the pit in cubic meters.

Figures from 2017. Almost 2 years old. 137 t F1 sand delivered: 1914.50; Three extra hours excavator 240.00; 250 cbm soil removal 2520.00; 53 t concrete recycling installed: 1056.00: Including tax 6819.00 additional earthworks costs. The fact that no removal was necessary was therefore a memory lapse. Of what remained, the landscaper then took the rest. We actually only had it removed once. K.

Hey,

we had calculated 5T EUR for earthworks (only excavation and gravel).
In the end, it was 10T EUR, so double.
We had over 500t of gravel alone, excavation was on average 1.00 meter.

Regards