Does the architect's design provide for a room height of 2.75 meters?

Hi,
unfortunately, I can't discover anything about the described matter on this cropped, basement-floor-indicating little stamp.
First of all, it seems that the starting point of the measurement on the ground floor is OK finished floor level.
If it only went up to the underside of the ceiling, one could call it clear room height...
Do you have a better interpretable picture?

Furthermore, it is relevant in which federal state you are building. Where in BW 2.30 officially suffices to create living space, it is (I believe) at least 2.50 in Hamburg (or was it Berlin, oh well).

We have in the basement/ground floor/upper floor 2.40/2.55/2.42 and think that's quite good.
On the ground floor, I would never go below 2.50 – with normally sized rooms.
But as said: first clarify what is really meant in your plan.

Regards
ks

I always find it astonishing what kind of questions people come up with here.

No offense, but you can't leave the ceiling height up to the opinion of the forum. Aside from the fact that you can't see anything at all in the picture...

It looks like it might be the basement, doesn't it? 2.40 meters is quite normal there.

Um...
Terraced houses and large rooms??
That’s what I call a good example. I don’t know any terraced house with large rooms. But I’m happy to be proven wrong.

Um... Terraced houses and large rooms?? That’s what I call a good example. I don’t know any terraced house with large rooms. But I’m happy to be proven wrong.

And are you planning or building houses? I would say self-disqualified

Yes, I plan and build houses. And I don't plan "doghouses" with a width of 5 m. My "terraced houses" have at least a width of 7 m, otherwise anyone who feels like it can plan and anyone even more funny can build. There are enough architects who are happy about every order. Let them deal with "huuuuge" rooms in a terraced house. I gladly disqualify myself. Spelling mistakes you can keep, they come for free.