Dissatisfied with the architect's plan

Hello everyone!

We have had several appointments with our architect by now and are unfortunately quite dissatisfied with the designs. These are now the 5th drafts and still quite far from what we imagine.

Here are the drafts for now.

I am especially bothered by the crooked rooms. According to the architect, this is necessary due to the statics of the city villa...

And the questionnaire

Development plan/restrictions
Size of the plot 914 sqm
Slope yes visible in the plan
Building window, building line and boundary see plan
Edge development see site plan

Requirements of the builders
Style, roof shape, building type
Basement, stories
Number of people, age
Space needed on ground floor, upper floor
Office: family use or home office?
Guests per year
Open or closed architecture
Conservative or modern construction
Open kitchen, kitchen island
Number of dining seats
Fireplace
Music/stereo wall
Balcony, roof terrace
Garage, carport
Utility garden, greenhouse
Additional wishes/special features/daily routine, gladly also reasons why this or that should or should not be included

House design
Who is the planner:
-Planner of a construction company
-Architect
-Do-it-yourself
What do you particularly like? Why?
What do you not like? Why?
Price estimate according to architect/planner:
Personal price limit for the house, including equipment:
Preferred heating technology:

If you have to do without, which details/extensions
-can you do without:
-can you not do without:

Why was the design made the way it is now? For example
Standard design from the planner?
Which wishes were implemented by the architect?
A mix of many examples from various magazines...
What makes it particularly good or bad in your opinion?

Now corrected

And the questionnaire

Development plan/restrictions
Size of the property 914 sqm
Slope yes visible in the plan. From the street to the back edge of the house approx. 3 m
Building window, building line and boundary see plan
Edge development see site plan

Requirements of the builders
Style, roof shape, building type town villa
Basement, stories 2 full stories without basement
Number of persons, age 4 of which two children
Room requirements on the ground floor, upper floor see design
Guests sleeping per year often
Open or closed architecture rather closed
Kitchen dining room in one room with large sliding door to the living room
Fireplace tiled stove in the living room ideally to be fired from the hallway or utility room
Music/stereo wall position open
Garage used as basement replacement, in front two parking spaces

House design
Who created the design:
-Architect
What is not liked? Why? Winding rooms
Preferred heating technology: gas underfloor heating plus tiled stove

Why is the design the way it is now? E.g.
In discussions it has mainly been about dealing with the slope, the rest developed somewhat incidentally

Angular walls do not have to be present in an urban villa and are nowadays never strictly necessary in terms of statics. Instead, there are beams and girders.

In my opinion, the complex rooms are more due to the architect starting with an angular layout on the ground floor and transferring it 1:1 to the upper floor so that load-bearing walls align exactly - this makes it structurally easier and cheaper.

I’m sorry, but I don’t understand what you mean by "verwinkelt." Would you prefer a more open architecture? The only part that is actually "verwinkelt" is the entrance to the dining room / hallway area. If you remove the angle, the hallway feels uncomfortable and cramped. My problem is the "staircase." It makes the whole thing so rigid and somehow eerie. But I have no experience with schematic designs.

I also ask what exactly you mean by "verwinkelt"? Do you mean the recesses and projections in the walls of the rooms, e.g. living room or bedroom?

If yes: So we also built a town villa, somewhat smaller than yours (160 m²) and we don't have that! It was no problem structurally.