Dismantling of a construction road

Competent answers are certainly available here, but for that the OP, meaning you, must also provide the necessary information. The question was about exactly what was specified/in the offer. If you don’t answer that, you can’t expect precise answers. The coffee ground reading was given up some time ago and the crystal balls have not yet been delivered. In the other forum, you also did not make certain statements that you expressed here (e.g., the entrepreneur’s statement “is not in the offer,” etc.). This means that the answers there correspond more to coffee ground reading than the answers here. It is also the case that you forget that the statement you quoted above from the other forum is only one of 3 possible! variants where the user listed how the tender might have looked! So this is only meaningful if it actually happened that way, but no one here knows this since you do not respond/answer the users’ inquiries here. However, of course it is easier to tailor the users’ answers to suit oneself...

After all, with the statement "so hier vermutlich geschehen," he provided the correct one. And describing three possible variants is not just guesswork. In any case, the right one was included – and that counts.

I actually overlooked the question about the contract content. That sometimes happens to me with know-it-all formulations ...

Whether this is actually the right one is not for us to judge as long as the complete description of the assignment is not available. If it is as suspected above, you have a chance.

Best regards
Dirk Grafe

Well, tape is something different from 20 tons of construction road. And the tape is an accessory, the construction road is the main thing.

So the question remains: Was the construction and dismantling ordered or only the construction.

The plasterer also doesn’t go and chip out the plaster at the end.

Lay opinion: The construction road is site equipment, like the toilet, the construction fence, the site electricity, etc. By no means comparable or to be confused with the taping by a painter or formwork by a shell constructor. Thus, the topic of the construction road falls into the responsibility of the client.

Otherwise it depends on what was agreed. Who ordered the construction of the construction road?

THOSE are know-it-all formulations?!? Sure... And in the other forum, the questions afterward were all know-it-all too!? Well, if you think letting others guess how it could have happened and hoping one is right is the proper approach.

I rather have the impression here that he is looking for the answer that suits him.

He was given several variants in the other forum as well and then simply considered the one that fit best with his agenda as suitable.

Anyone who is too proud to provide sufficient background information shouldn't be surprised if they don't receive meaningful answers.

so he has to dismantle, satisfied?

and now??