Consumer construction contract without land?

  • Erstellt am 2020-08-17 23:44:48

T_im_Norden

2020-08-18 06:55:21
  • #1
No, I wouldn't. I also don't consider it a serious approach.

Building a house makes little sense without land, so first find land, then a construction company.
 

Pinky0301

2020-08-18 07:22:08
  • #2
That's nonsense. They can't just pull land out of a hat. Search here in the forum, there are already some threads about it. Or can help with that
 

11ant

2020-08-18 14:51:33
  • #3

Yes, I have already covered the topic several times, the most recent summary of findings on the search term "11ant short sale" can be found here: - if the links bounce, you have to manually change the "T" in "/threads/" back to lowercase)
In short, the legislator has left a gap in criminal liability here that apparently has not yet been patched with case law – in a way, the Criminal Code has not passed the "blower door test": the "real estate service" usually means that – with moderately creative waiver of a legally required broker license – plots of land are offered in a manner similar to what one would call a "short sale" in stocks. That is, the provider does not yet own the plots, he himself first goes looking for them (of course without being authorized as a broker for this offer) or draws from a pool of randomly known land offers – but without at least having made a reservation with the seller. As you can hardly expect otherwise, the search for a replacement may then drag on forever. The risk for the prospective builder then lies in the questionable equivalence of the replacement offers. Therefore, from my point of view, the hottest follow-up question so far was

.
A good friend of mine – who unfortunately often listens to me too late when it would be important – is currently also searching for a plot and has been offered every meadow for more than half a year by a house provider named after a part of a poodle’s body, "that wasn’t ‘three’ up the tree." During this time, there were not even two plots on which the same house model would both fit and be allowed to be built. If he were fixed on this – that is, had already set his sights on a specific favorite house – it would be nearly guaranteed that the search would have to be fruitless.

I apologize to my fans that my guide on the topic is not yet finished, but after the editor, lawyers will also have to read it.

And to close the knowledge gap of Ms. Dentist: in 2018, the legislator determined for a certain group of cases that a classic contract for work and services was not specific enough and that a construction contract was called for. Considering the different needs for protection of private and commercial builders, the "consumer construction contract" was created.
 

Elokine

2020-08-18 15:10:32
  • #4
The following happened to acquaintances of ours: they were sure that they would build with a certain regional structural engineering company. For the new development area soon to be developed in the town, they were at the top of the waiting list. So they signed a contract with the construction company and had the house fully planned. Unfortunately or fortunately, in the meantime they were offered an existing house in really unbeatable condition at a bargain price and could not do anything but accept. So now out of the contract – with a penalty payment in the five-figure range!
 

FoxMulder24

2020-08-18 17:09:58
  • #5
Or how it went in our family. A relative signs with a large prefabricated house provider (shell construction), without having a plot of land. "To secure the price." Shortly after, he finds a plot of land himself. However, the "purchased" house does not comply with the local development plan and is therefore not permitted. So a new house MUST be planned, BUT now at a new price. Of course, significantly more expensive, with less space.
 

Pinkiponk

2020-08-18 17:20:08
  • #6
No, I wouldn’t, and please don’t do it either. This is a clear scam, albeit in a legal gray area. I have already written a lot about this in earlier threads; maybe you want to take a look there. In short: They do not have any plots of land and only offer you what is available on the open market, directly and without obligation, even for you. And if they ever can offer a plot of land under certain circumstances, it is one on which, for good reasons, no one wants to build (this was the case with us) or they offer the plot of land to the party that buys the most expensive house from them.
 

Similar topics
16.06.2011Conclude a construction contract under reservation?10
13.09.2012Feeling pressured into a contract, is that normal?17
29.09.2011Is construction pre-planning without signature / contract legally valid?12
22.09.2012Who else fell for a contract with a reservation clause? - Search13
16.05.2015Contract unclear: humus earth collectors10
23.08.2015Construction financing with a fixed-term contract13
04.07.2016Building without a contract - Concerns?39
10.09.2016Construction financing and contract with the developer24
02.12.2016Plots in Cologne only through developers?54
28.09.2016Question about early repayment and clause in the contract41
28.05.2017Plundering the Riester contract - for less need for credit?16
06.06.2017Local bank markets plots - linked deal26
16.08.2018Civil engineering works without a contract - normal, experiences?10
07.11.2019Experience finding plots by asking neighbors10
10.11.20202 (dream) properties - financing unclear. Save equity?40
05.08.2021Divide and develop plots themselves24
12.01.2022Union of two plots - redefine the building envelope?20
16.05.2022Which plots are the best in this building area (with plan)?17
05.09.2023Application for a new development area: Selection of plots41

Oben