Ushermittwoch
2020-08-19 11:03:58
- #1
Hello,
I am happy to share my own personal experience here. We recently signed such a contract ourselves, from which we, to get ahead of the story, have fortunately already exited again thanks to the right of withdrawal. Especially in metropolitan areas and their surroundings, finding land is becoming increasingly difficult, partly because many plots never even reach the market and everything happens through "connections." Therefore, this land service is naturally very attractive, also for us. Our conditions were actually quite clear:
- We could refuse as often as we wanted
- The contract was limited to 12 months
- The radius in which the plot should be located was clearly defined
- If we had purchased an existing building, we could have terminated the contract again
So far, so good. However, a "placeholder house" was then planned, which could be completely discarded and redesigned depending on the plot. For example, switching from a single-family house to a semi-detached house. (Depending on the plot and how flexible we were) I will now try to summarize this really in bullet points and get as little worked up as possible about our naivety at the time of signing the contract (Bien-Zenker by the way)...
- Placeholder house was a rough price indicator; equipment and additional costs for selection were unknown
- Then a plot was suggested, a project with a semi-detached house. So we would have had to completely redesign
- An existing building would have had to be demolished on the plot. The demolition company that had cooperated for years gave a rough estimate for the demolition
- Pressure was applied to arrange a notary appointment with the owner → direct quote, we’ll manage the house later... the plot is only reserved until such and such date (By the way, the plot really existed and we were on site to see it. The owner's data was also finally sent to us. The project itself would have been great, but the process was a disaster)
--> Note to myself: Listing it like this first shows what an impossible and stupid construct this already was....
- Status quo: At this point, we were supposed to arrange a notary appointment without a house price, with no idea how much additional cost for selection would still come up, without exact plot costs (because the demolition costs from the well-known and friendly company could not be fixedly promised...) and without the plot having been surveyed since it would have had to be divided. Apart from the fact that the bank would not lend a single cent for such nonsense, I wonder how the HVs of Bien-Zenker thought this through.....
When we finally woke up, we made it very clear what we needed at all to even consider a notary appointment.... The well-formulated email with our worries and demands was answered in a way that blamed us for these uncertainties. Moreover, after meeting with other builders, things came to light that can at least be described as very differing information flow between the builders or, and that fits better, important information was consciously withheld. Fortunately, the contract process took so long that the last signature was less than 14 days ago. --> Right of withdrawal and goodbye!
Looking back, the fact that we signed the contract at all was a mixture of desperation (to build a house) and trustfulness. Well, you learn from your mistakes and I am convinced that my experience is not the norm!
After now properly informing myself (yes, I know, Step 1a before signing...), comparing, and having many conversations with other prefab house companies that also offer a land service, I come to the conclusion that I do not want to demonize the construct in general. For me, the following parameters must be right:
- It must be clear from the start which house with which equipment you want to build, a fully planned house with costs as precise as possible
- For this planned house, a plot is then sought within a clearly defined radius with my budget and m² expectations
- We may refuse as often as we want
- The contract is limited to 12 months
- If purchasing an existing building, we could terminate the contract again
The professional consultants also gave me no great hopes regarding the land search in our area (Rhine-Main) and warned of some pitfalls, without me having reported on our fiasco. Moreover, there are only a few providers who would do all this under the above-described conditions, so you can sort quickly. One last thing: Never sign anything at the desk during a meeting, take your time to review the contract calmly and preferably with legal support!!! Sometimes, and I had to realize this reflectively as well, it is the absolutely obvious things that you inexplicably do wrong.
So, that’s it from my side
Regards
I am happy to share my own personal experience here. We recently signed such a contract ourselves, from which we, to get ahead of the story, have fortunately already exited again thanks to the right of withdrawal. Especially in metropolitan areas and their surroundings, finding land is becoming increasingly difficult, partly because many plots never even reach the market and everything happens through "connections." Therefore, this land service is naturally very attractive, also for us. Our conditions were actually quite clear:
- We could refuse as often as we wanted
- The contract was limited to 12 months
- The radius in which the plot should be located was clearly defined
- If we had purchased an existing building, we could have terminated the contract again
So far, so good. However, a "placeholder house" was then planned, which could be completely discarded and redesigned depending on the plot. For example, switching from a single-family house to a semi-detached house. (Depending on the plot and how flexible we were) I will now try to summarize this really in bullet points and get as little worked up as possible about our naivety at the time of signing the contract (Bien-Zenker by the way)...
- Placeholder house was a rough price indicator; equipment and additional costs for selection were unknown
- Then a plot was suggested, a project with a semi-detached house. So we would have had to completely redesign
- An existing building would have had to be demolished on the plot. The demolition company that had cooperated for years gave a rough estimate for the demolition
- Pressure was applied to arrange a notary appointment with the owner → direct quote, we’ll manage the house later... the plot is only reserved until such and such date (By the way, the plot really existed and we were on site to see it. The owner's data was also finally sent to us. The project itself would have been great, but the process was a disaster)
--> Note to myself: Listing it like this first shows what an impossible and stupid construct this already was....
- Status quo: At this point, we were supposed to arrange a notary appointment without a house price, with no idea how much additional cost for selection would still come up, without exact plot costs (because the demolition costs from the well-known and friendly company could not be fixedly promised...) and without the plot having been surveyed since it would have had to be divided. Apart from the fact that the bank would not lend a single cent for such nonsense, I wonder how the HVs of Bien-Zenker thought this through.....
When we finally woke up, we made it very clear what we needed at all to even consider a notary appointment.... The well-formulated email with our worries and demands was answered in a way that blamed us for these uncertainties. Moreover, after meeting with other builders, things came to light that can at least be described as very differing information flow between the builders or, and that fits better, important information was consciously withheld. Fortunately, the contract process took so long that the last signature was less than 14 days ago. --> Right of withdrawal and goodbye!
Looking back, the fact that we signed the contract at all was a mixture of desperation (to build a house) and trustfulness. Well, you learn from your mistakes and I am convinced that my experience is not the norm!
After now properly informing myself (yes, I know, Step 1a before signing...), comparing, and having many conversations with other prefab house companies that also offer a land service, I come to the conclusion that I do not want to demonize the construct in general. For me, the following parameters must be right:
- It must be clear from the start which house with which equipment you want to build, a fully planned house with costs as precise as possible
- For this planned house, a plot is then sought within a clearly defined radius with my budget and m² expectations
- We may refuse as often as we want
- The contract is limited to 12 months
- If purchasing an existing building, we could terminate the contract again
The professional consultants also gave me no great hopes regarding the land search in our area (Rhine-Main) and warned of some pitfalls, without me having reported on our fiasco. Moreover, there are only a few providers who would do all this under the above-described conditions, so you can sort quickly. One last thing: Never sign anything at the desk during a meeting, take your time to review the contract calmly and preferably with legal support!!! Sometimes, and I had to realize this reflectively as well, it is the absolutely obvious things that you inexplicably do wrong.
So, that’s it from my side
Regards