dobabau
2016-01-05 21:17:02
- #1
Hello everyone,
we would like to start our construction project in the second half of the year and are currently in the exploration and decision-making phase for the building partner/architect. Apart from the floor plan, we already have quite detailed ideas; I would like to briefly outline the cost drivers:
- House according to the Energy Saving Ordinance (not a KfW efficiency house)
- Simple architecture with a gable roof (no dormers, cross gables, bay windows, etc.)
- 160 m² living space + approx. 80 m² basement (about 40 m² of which is habitable for a sauna and one room)
- Double garage
- Gas condensing boiler with solar thermal system
- Underfloor heating
- Controlled residential ventilation with heat recovery
- Wood/aluminum windows with triple glazing
- Small freestanding wood stove
- Parquet flooring, glued in most of the living area
- Electric roller shutters via KNX
- Partial KNX in the living/dining area, prepared for later retrofitting
The plot is almost flat, slopes about ~1 m over 25 m length as estimated.
We have 410,000 EUR available for implementation including construction ancillary costs (connections, construction electricity, etc.). I get a 25% discount on material costs for heating, solar thermal system, controlled residential ventilation, wood stove. In addition, we get the surveying work almost for free except for a few euros in fees.
Not included in the calculation are the plot, acquisition ancillary costs (tax, notary, double rent, etc.), kitchen, sauna, outdoor facilities – there is a separate budget for these.
My cost calculation:
- 25,000 EUR construction ancillary costs, leaves 385,000 EUR pure construction costs
- 25,000 EUR garage, leaves 360,000 EUR
- 70,000 EUR basement, leaves 290,000 EUR
This corresponds to about 1,800 €/m² for the house.
The biggest uncertainty is definitely the basement, as the information varies wildly. We have no groundwater but poorly water-permeable rock (muschelkalk). Are 70,000 EUR realistic here? Another critical point is also the architect’s fee, which should basically be covered by the price per m² (if we build by individual contracts…).
Some architects and general contractors practically threw this back at us (“you want a Porsche at a VW price”). Are we really so far off with the above wishes? In my opinion, only the windows and the (partial) KNX system are really extraordinary cost drivers on the list. The other points are somehow “normal”…?
Has anyone implemented something similar? Where would you cut costs?
I would appreciate a few opinions, thank you!
we would like to start our construction project in the second half of the year and are currently in the exploration and decision-making phase for the building partner/architect. Apart from the floor plan, we already have quite detailed ideas; I would like to briefly outline the cost drivers:
- House according to the Energy Saving Ordinance (not a KfW efficiency house)
- Simple architecture with a gable roof (no dormers, cross gables, bay windows, etc.)
- 160 m² living space + approx. 80 m² basement (about 40 m² of which is habitable for a sauna and one room)
- Double garage
- Gas condensing boiler with solar thermal system
- Underfloor heating
- Controlled residential ventilation with heat recovery
- Wood/aluminum windows with triple glazing
- Small freestanding wood stove
- Parquet flooring, glued in most of the living area
- Electric roller shutters via KNX
- Partial KNX in the living/dining area, prepared for later retrofitting
The plot is almost flat, slopes about ~1 m over 25 m length as estimated.
We have 410,000 EUR available for implementation including construction ancillary costs (connections, construction electricity, etc.). I get a 25% discount on material costs for heating, solar thermal system, controlled residential ventilation, wood stove. In addition, we get the surveying work almost for free except for a few euros in fees.
Not included in the calculation are the plot, acquisition ancillary costs (tax, notary, double rent, etc.), kitchen, sauna, outdoor facilities – there is a separate budget for these.
My cost calculation:
- 25,000 EUR construction ancillary costs, leaves 385,000 EUR pure construction costs
- 25,000 EUR garage, leaves 360,000 EUR
- 70,000 EUR basement, leaves 290,000 EUR
This corresponds to about 1,800 €/m² for the house.
The biggest uncertainty is definitely the basement, as the information varies wildly. We have no groundwater but poorly water-permeable rock (muschelkalk). Are 70,000 EUR realistic here? Another critical point is also the architect’s fee, which should basically be covered by the price per m² (if we build by individual contracts…).
Some architects and general contractors practically threw this back at us (“you want a Porsche at a VW price”). Are we really so far off with the above wishes? In my opinion, only the windows and the (partial) KNX system are really extraordinary cost drivers on the list. The other points are somehow “normal”…?
Has anyone implemented something similar? Where would you cut costs?
I would appreciate a few opinions, thank you!