Civil engineer proposes deviations from the drainage plan

  • Erstellt am 2020-06-03 07:28:48

bauenmk2020

2020-06-03 07:28:48
  • #1
Hello,

my known civil engineer will install the drainage (rainwater and wastewater) for us.
We have a single-family house with rainwater downpipes on all sides of the house. The wastewater pipes are led out on one side of the house under the floor slab (3 pipes).
There is a house connection inspection chamber on the property that receives all pipes (combined system).

According to the drainage plan, all rainwater pipes (+ drainage pipe for the heat pump) are combined or run around the house on 3 sides and then slope down into the inspection chamber. The wastewater is also led into this chamber via a separate pipe on the short side of the house.

2 inspection chambers for rainwater and 1 inspection chamber for wastewater are planned.

The civil engineer now wants to split the rainwater pipe: 3 rainwater downpipes according to the plan but connect 1 rainwater downpipe to the wastewater pipe to save pipe length.
He wants to do completely without the inspection chambers.

I also believe he envisions a step change in the pipe somewhere (nominal diameter change).

My question in advance: Is this execution basically okay?
 

vanny2705

2020-06-03 07:39:13
  • #2
Please insert the drainage plan, that would be very helpful.
 

fach1werk

2020-06-03 09:35:31
  • #3
I would not do without inspection shafts or at least one. If something happens, it is very convenient.

Best regards
Gabriele
 

halmi

2020-06-03 09:53:48
  • #4
No one can answer that. Whether wastewater and rainwater may be combined, or whether one or more inspection shafts are required, is specified by the development plan or the municipality.
 

knalltüte

2020-06-03 18:11:04
  • #5


That is indeed the case. Doing so leads to financial consequences such as the recalculation of the discharge fee, etc. Not to mention the costs of dismantling.

My expertise: about 30 years ago, I worked for about a year in the lower water authority (so don’t rely too much on that).
 

Zaba12

2020-06-03 18:36:14
  • #6
The answer is relatively simple. Do what is stated in the development plan. You cannot cover up missing inspection shafts. But do whatever you want, you will have to bear the consequences.
 

Similar topics
04.07.2016Using rainwater for the house?!24
16.11.2015Rainwater cistern: Useful? Necessary? Costs?25
15.08.2016Civil engineer contradicts structural engineer27
18.11.2016Infiltration of rainwater10
09.05.2017Infiltration of rainwater, which method?64
20.09.2018Construction of lines on the property - experiences?14
11.04.2020Collect rainwater or drill a well?43
10.04.2020Rainwater from the roof - drainage in the soil for discharge?12
25.04.2020Responsibility Drainage Plan12
30.04.2020Rainwater from the cistern also for laundry and toilet flushing?22
18.01.2021Pressure drainage (wastewater only)15
13.08.2020Assessment of pathway plot with important municipal lines10
25.03.2021Leading pipes from the house into the garage14
29.03.2021Letting rainwater infiltrate - cost-effective option?20
11.04.2021Crossing lines of various supply lines12
26.03.2023Construction of a 144 sqm bungalow in Fichtenwalde (near Potsdam)1184
24.07.2021Disconnection of pipes before demolition -> Costs/Experience?15
14.09.2021Civil engineer calculates excavator performance by tons - experiences?21
13.11.2021Requirements for ancillary apartment, wiring, meters, etc.13

Oben