bauenmk2020
2020-06-03 07:28:48
- #1
Hello,
my known civil engineer will install the drainage (rainwater and wastewater) for us.
We have a single-family house with rainwater downpipes on all sides of the house. The wastewater pipes are led out on one side of the house under the floor slab (3 pipes).
There is a house connection inspection chamber on the property that receives all pipes (combined system).
According to the drainage plan, all rainwater pipes (+ drainage pipe for the heat pump) are combined or run around the house on 3 sides and then slope down into the inspection chamber. The wastewater is also led into this chamber via a separate pipe on the short side of the house.
2 inspection chambers for rainwater and 1 inspection chamber for wastewater are planned.
The civil engineer now wants to split the rainwater pipe: 3 rainwater downpipes according to the plan but connect 1 rainwater downpipe to the wastewater pipe to save pipe length.
He wants to do completely without the inspection chambers.
I also believe he envisions a step change in the pipe somewhere (nominal diameter change).
My question in advance: Is this execution basically okay?
my known civil engineer will install the drainage (rainwater and wastewater) for us.
We have a single-family house with rainwater downpipes on all sides of the house. The wastewater pipes are led out on one side of the house under the floor slab (3 pipes).
There is a house connection inspection chamber on the property that receives all pipes (combined system).
According to the drainage plan, all rainwater pipes (+ drainage pipe for the heat pump) are combined or run around the house on 3 sides and then slope down into the inspection chamber. The wastewater is also led into this chamber via a separate pipe on the short side of the house.
2 inspection chambers for rainwater and 1 inspection chamber for wastewater are planned.
The civil engineer now wants to split the rainwater pipe: 3 rainwater downpipes according to the plan but connect 1 rainwater downpipe to the wastewater pipe to save pipe length.
He wants to do completely without the inspection chambers.
I also believe he envisions a step change in the pipe somewhere (nominal diameter change).
My question in advance: Is this execution basically okay?