Burglary Protection: Planning Outdoor Lighting with Sensors

  • Erstellt am 2020-09-27 13:26:35

Mycraft

2020-09-28 09:45:16
  • #1

The issue is now constantly being talked about. I keep wondering what is supposed to be safe about it when the person ringing the bell can add 2+2 and immediately realize that nobody is home.


But if it then lies motionless for 2-3 days, isn’t that more of an indication of absence?
 

Ybias78

2020-09-28 09:49:13
  • #2


Then better control the light via app and have it turn on and off at irregular intervals in the evening when absent.
 

rick2018

2020-09-28 10:01:16
  • #3
Presence simulation is almost useless. During planned burglaries, surveillance is conducted. It quickly becomes clear whether someone is home or not. It does not matter if the light is on or the TV is running.
It is just as much a myth as shutters being a burglary protection...
Only mechanical protection helps (doors, windows, frames, locks...), increasing the detection probability (lights, motion detectors, light barriers, cameras, dog, neighbors, alarm system...) so far that the risk of success is too low and it is not worth it.
You have to be a tougher target than the neighbor.
However, one should also be aware that living in a prison is certainly no fun. The more complex it becomes, the more likely there will be false alarms or a resident or guest will trigger it.
The non-transparent areas should be protected the most. There are hardly any break-ins through the front door.
 

Ybias78

2020-09-28 10:11:00
  • #4


There are not only burglars of type A, who plan everything and work professionally. There are also opportunistic or spontaneous burglars who want to break in that very evening. And if the light is on and the car is in front of the door, it is very unlikely that they will break in.

Therefore, I would contradict your blanket statement.
 

ypg

2020-09-28 10:23:18
  • #5


A thief doesn't come a second time. Maybe by chance 3 years later... They are dropped off near residential areas, one rings the doorbell, the second goes out of sight... three hours later they are already in another district, 3 months later they are replaced. The thief who existed 30 years ago and always eavesdropped on the neighbor's stereo system and waited for a good moment no longer exists. Neither do dares or acquisitive crimes in that way anymore. Much of it happens digitally: bank cards, account data... But as already said: everyone has to calm their own feelings: what use is the greatest security measure if the inviting sliding terrace door is left open unnoticed and you are working in the basement
 

pagoni2020

2020-09-28 11:59:11
  • #6

YES, the personal "security feeling" is just as important as actual existing security, because an insecure feeling greatly affects my quality of life, regardless of whether this feeling really matches reality.

I see the "mushroom heads" or similar technical devices the same way as useful technology for burglary prevention, and the other things give you a good, safe feeling yourself and possibly also work in individual cases. That is why THAT is right for YOU, I also always ensure my own well-being alongside technical things, whether anyone understands that or not; even a spouse might have a different view and he/she should definitely also think about their own security feeling.

....if it positively affects your personal feeling, definitely YES. Whether it actually helps.......cannot be determined.

The big difference is whether one becomes the victim of (more common) "normal" apartment burglars, who mostly roam through neighborhoods in the winter half-year from late afternoon on to see where they can quickly and easily grab something, or whether one becomes (possibly) the victim of certain burglars who deliberately and plannedly select specific objects/persons because they suspect or even know there is something specific there (expensive car, paintings, larger cash amounts of a business owner, etc.). Therefore, it plays a significant role what exactly I want to protect myself from and how.
For this reason, broad "watering can" thinking or quick, unquestioned advertising promises are usually misplaced.

Exactly! That applies in 99% of all cases. Anyone who spends days deliberately scouting and surveilling an object will not come to my single-family house anyway.

Yep...... one knows their way around!!!
That’s exactly how it happens in 99% of the cases and against that you can protect yourself relatively well with simple means, as and wrote, to make it harder or more difficult, strictly following the "Holy Saint Florian / Spare my house, set others on fire!" principle.

There is no general protection, no matter what I pay or install. I have to tailor it to my situation/person. Do I want to protect myself from the pervert who might even break in upstairs for sexual reasons, from the car thief who wants my Porsche, from the annoying doorbell ringers/beggars, the "normal" 99% typical apartment burglar, the child molester (who mostly is much closer than one might think), the curious neighbor’s gaze, or the thief who wants my firewood, winter tires, or bicycles.
We lived for a while in an absolutely safe country that nevertheless has a wildly exaggerated sense of insecurity among the population. Sirens constantly blared, beeped, and shrilled wherever you went; eventually, no one responded to it anymore, it just whistled and shrilled constantly... with or without a thief.
Many houses had electric fences and several intentionally made-aggressive shepherd dogs on the property, families mostly lived in gated communities and lived in fear of everything and everyone... except the church, mobile phones, and the sugar they shoved into themselves by the kilo.
Let’s see how long it will take until it’s similar here. We are certainly already well on our way there... and despite all understanding for home security, THAT is what frightens me the most!
 
Oben