Bathroom layout must be changed

I assume that the window on the right side = east side should remain ... but why does it have to be floor-to-ceiling? A problem that does not have to be. What is wrong with a window with a normal sill height? And why does the floor-to-ceiling window bother at the shower there? A pleated blind solves "privacy issues"

And what is the argument why there can be no window on the right side in the current plan?

See one post above, where I partially answered your questions.

We do not exclude a normal window with a sill, but floor-to-ceiling would be our wish thanks to the nice view (ideally from the bathtub).

This is a variant from the first drafts. It should not be a problem from the house provider’s side. Why did we change it? We wanted to have the bathtub in view from the shower. :-)

Then show a bit more of the floor plan. The view of the east side is also helpful. Is the T variant your favorite?

How often is the toilet used per day? How often the shower? When showering you don’t look outside.

Bedroom and bathroom windows at the height of the top edge of the bathtub.

Then show a bit more of the floor plan. The view of the east side is also helpful. Is the T variant your favorite?

How often is the WC used per day? How often the shower? You don’t look outside while showering.

Bedroom and bathroom windows at the height of the top edge of the bathtub.

Attached is more of the eastern floor plan and the view of the east side.

The T variant is our favorite, but we are still looking at other options.

For the house provider, the window on the east side is not feasible because, due to the placement of the shower, water can reach the window. For liability reasons, they do not approve it, as over many years water could gradually get into the wall.

Because you don't want a shower enclosure? To me, the shower looks too short to go without an enclosure. However, I also don’t find the bathroom layout very great: the tub is carelessly placed in the corner without any shelf platforms (70x170 is also not an ideal size for bathing) and the rest is as it currently has to be.

Ideally a floor-to-ceiling one, because we also have floor-to-ceiling windows in the adjacent room and that looks significantly more aesthetic from the outside than if they differ in height.

Well, currently the facade on the east side is very overloaded, so you can’t really speak of aesthetics now. Less is often more. And planned variety brings excitement.

Because you don't want a shower enclosure? To me, the shower looks too short to do without an enclosure. I don't think the bathroom layout is great either: the tub is carelessly placed in the corner without any shelf platforms (70x170 is also not an ideal size for bathing) and the rest is as it has to be at the moment.

Well, currently the facade on the east side is very overloaded, so you can't really talk about aesthetics. Less is often more. And planned variety brings excitement.

Thanks to you too for your opinion.

A platform can still be added during the sample selection and we are already considering it in the new planning.

In the attached draft, the enclosure is short, that's true. What do you think of the draft on page 2 (corner shower)?