The radio actuators are the same as the switching actuators in a DIN rail in a network cabinet.
Oh, I see, the discussion is based on false assumptions. You suppose it would be equivalent. I have to disappoint you there. The radio actuators for the socket or the lamps and other components of everyday home automation at this level are then "only" consumer grade. You can already tell that just by looking from the outside, let alone if you take off the plastic packaging and look inside.
It is irrelevant how the signals are transmitted, whether by cable or wireless.
No, you can't say that either. Because with wireless, a lot of unnecessary stuff comes along.
What's decisive is what happens behind it, like a light turning on or a bunch of other things happening...
No, not only the result but also the way to get there is important. Because depending on how you set things up, there can also be significant delays or even dropouts and telegrams going into the void.
PS: always with the guiding principle that you choose an open wireless protocol and impose as few "dependencies" as possible (central unit, batteries, ...)
Yes, that's just it... with wireless, you automatically put yourself on a higher level of dependency than with cables.