Attempted break-in without damage

What would it change if we all now say that it was an attempted break-in?
Are you then going to the insurance with the printout of this thread?

If no traces are present and none of you caused the damage, then it is probably a defect. That’s somehow logical....

Would report the defective window and claim the warranty, and that's it.

Just upload a picture. If someone tried to break in and the window even warped because of it, there should be a lever mark/tool mark visible. I once suspected an attempted break-in on the office door and found several pressure marks in the wood. In the end, the idiot (me) closed the door a few times and the keychain/key fob got caught... hence the suspicious marks :eek:, different story, but I could tell you that sometimes you get stuck on a train of thought. No marks – no break-in attempt, you can be almost certain of that.

Approach it logically: Whoever knows how to enter houses without signs of break-in will not fail at a plastic window. The others leave traces. So no break-in attempt.

Maybe someone here is familiar with the topic and knows, for example, that a break-in leaves no traces and that the damage pattern may indicate an attempt.

Visit the police. Whether they will come currently... i dont know

Please excuse the late response.. Your comments helped to approach the matter more soberly. At first, one has tunnel vision, because on the one hand there were no signs to be seen, but on the other hand the window did not close properly. From our point of view, several factors suggest a break-in, but your arguments, which we had not considered before, are more understandable. I looked at the window again and as it seems, it is a mounting error. I tried so hard to find damage that it was only over the weekend that I noticed that the rails where the mushroom-head lock latches are on one side are not present at all. Therefore, the window does not close properly, it drafts, and it can then be easily pushed open. It will be replaced.

Thank you for your contributions, because until we found the error, we were at least calmer since we no longer assumed a break-in.