Good morning,
then I’ll try to explain that a bit more closely. ;)
I thank everyone for their contributions, but some things do make me smile.
The exit from the bathroom to the garden can just as well be considered a window if it reduces the fear of broken kneecaps. I simply can’t imagine (FOR US) a scenario in which something like that would happen, since the door, next to 2 other garden accesses, is probably not very frequently used and is usually kept locked. For guests who want to use the toilet at a barbecue evening or similar, there is a guest WC available.
Having the architect redesign the ground floor is absolutely not necessary for me. Why? Because someone considers the bathroom more important for themselves? We don’t, which is why we deliberately chose this solution so that the dressing room gets the space.
Also the given dimensions, where the bedroom would supposedly still be too small:
No, it is not a 1.60 bed. It is a 1.80, so a classic double bed. But since it adds width on the sides, I measured our current bed and rounded it up to 1.90m wide for the bed. That’s also how it is drawn.
With a raw structural dimension of 3.50m, about 3.47m remains after plastering. Minus 1.90m for the bed leaves 78.5cm on each side.
We didn’t want two washbasins anyway, it should rather be one large one.
Ultimately, however, it is clear to us that, as so often in construction, we consider what is really important to us and then have to make a compromise.
Currently, we tend to add a glass wall to the still masonry shower. That would then bring us to variants 1 or 3 or 5.
If we remove the slanted wall, only 3 or 5 remain. V5 would currently be our favorite.
