Alex85
2017-07-06 14:28:39
- #1
Between sitting in the dark and sitting in a glass house, there is still something in between.
This reminds me of an anecdote told by an acquaintance who was traveling in Texas on behalf of McKinsey. Scorching heat outside, in the client’s company headquarters it was ice-cold air-conditioned, and in the conference room of the executive floor the large fireplace was then lit.
It’s all possible, but it deprives the participants of any intelligence.
We are planning with geothermal energy, where passive cooling is an option. I hope to set the cold lakes on the ground, which are supposedly occurring, in motion through controlled residential ventilation. Otherwise, of course shading and masonry (sand-lime brick with mineral wool – more mass is hardly possible), which keeps the heat away for a long time. I also consider this the right approach: keeping cold/heat inside, instead of actively heating/cooling against it.
This reminds me of an anecdote told by an acquaintance who was traveling in Texas on behalf of McKinsey. Scorching heat outside, in the client’s company headquarters it was ice-cold air-conditioned, and in the conference room of the executive floor the large fireplace was then lit.
It’s all possible, but it deprives the participants of any intelligence.
We are planning with geothermal energy, where passive cooling is an option. I hope to set the cold lakes on the ground, which are supposedly occurring, in motion through controlled residential ventilation. Otherwise, of course shading and masonry (sand-lime brick with mineral wool – more mass is hardly possible), which keeps the heat away for a long time. I also consider this the right approach: keeping cold/heat inside, instead of actively heating/cooling against it.