Aerated concrete or Poroton for single-family house

Both variants exist with the same insulation values

Aerated concrete always had to be made thicker, which brings other negative aspects with it. The possibilities to increase thickness are also limited. With Poroton there are different fillings that improve thermal insulation. That means with filled Poroton you get better U-values than with aerated concrete of the same thickness.

Kfw 40 with 365 mm block? I don't believe that.

Aerated concrete always had to be taken thicker, which brings other negative aspects. The possibilities to increase thickness are also limited.
With Poroton, there are different fillings that improve thermal insulation. That means with filled Poroton you get better U-values than with aerated concrete of the same thickness.

KFW 40 with 365 mm block? I don't believe that.

How do you come to that conclusion? Both blocks come in different versions.

Aerated concrete is available in 36.5 cm, for example with a lambda of 0.07. Just turn on the internet and search for Therm Ultra.

You can achieve the same U-values with both.

One should not forget in the whole topic about "how much stone" we are actually talking about here: solid indeed, after all more than with foam panels stuck behind, but especially in the Anstatt villa with truss roof, in the upper floor often practically only lightweight walls will stand. Regarding sound insulation, I like to say it even for the hundredth time: there is no building material whose characteristics alone could even remotely compensate for improper installation.

How do you come to that? There are both stones in different versions.

Aerated concrete is available in 36.5, for example, with a lambda of 0.07. Just turn on the internet and look for Therm Ultra.

You can achieve the same U-values with both.

Yeah, you're right, I checked again.

Then it has SFK 1.6 at RDK 0.25. But that's not much stone anymore. The structural engineer will be pleased.

Then SFK 1.6 at RDK 0.25. But that is not much stone anymore. The structural engineer will be pleased.

You can achieve that with a "normal" single-family house as well.

It is more a matter of belief than facts.

That is why the often repeated advice is to make the decision more dependent on the processor.

Hello, the developer can use either aerated concrete or Poroton T9 with a thickness of 49cm. What is better in terms of thermal performance at 49cm?