§34 / 35 Building Code, Questions about Planning a Single-Family House

:eek: You, I would have argued one or two points similarly, but my statement was rather joking in response to the expert’s answer ... As a surveying technician, he will have more insight than we do, and then I don’t have to tack on my amateur rambling anymore. Sorry.

Ok, since I am relatively new here, I was not aware of your professional backgrounds and experiences :D Nevertheless, thank you very much!

Would the land use plan shared above change your assessment at all?

No.
However, it is not clear to me where the plan comes from. The brown color results from the overlay of the orange areas from the landscape plan with the green area, the origin of which I have not found out.
The landscape plan boundary can certainly be interpreted as a demarcation to the outer area, but you do not want to exceed that anyway. If the green area comes from the land use plan, I would first question who overlaid it with the cadastral map and the landscape plan. But even if the georeferencing is correct, the land use plan has no binding planning law significance. Moreover, its creation scale is not suitable to precisely influence factual building boundaries to the meter. Nevertheless, your planner should prepare for counterarguments from the administration, as the land use plan already provides indications of intended planning.

Off topic:

As a surveying technician

Why is the profession no longer displayed - not even in the profile? I found it helpful.

P.S.: Surveying technician engineer ;)

No. However, it is not clear to me where the plan originates. The brown color results from the overlay of the orange areas from the landscape plan with the green area, the origin of which I have not determined. The boundary of the landscape plan can certainly be interpreted as a demarcation to the outer area, but you do not want to cross that anyway. If the green area comes from the land use plan, I would first question who overlaid it with the cadastral map and the landscape plan. But even if the georeferencing is correct, the land use plan has no binding planning law significance. Moreover, its creation scale is not suitable to take meter-precise influence on actual building boundaries. Nevertheless, your planner should prepare for counterarguments from the administration, since the land use plan already provides indications of intended planning. Off topic: Why is the profession actually no longer displayed – not even in the profile? I found it helpful. P.S.: Surveyingtechnicianengineer ;)

Well, we will see what our architects and the office will present for arguments. So far, the building authority has made a fairly open-minded impression on me, so we will certainly find a solution or compromise. You just have to talk to each other. Thanks to your explanations, I can at least trust that the planned orientation of the building is not doomed to fail. I will report soon! :)

Why is the profession actually no longer displayed - not even in the profile? I found it helpful.

Me too... the place of construction is no longer asked for either...
But the bold font is gone as well ;)

P.S.: Vermessungstechnikeringenieur

Sorryyyy :cool:

Sorryyyy

No problem. I just wanted to say it.