20 years Volltiger or 15 years bet

  • Erstellt am 2019-01-24 17:13:48

Airea

2019-01-24 17:13:48
  • #1
Hello,
we have offers for real estate financing and despite much calculating and weighing options, we are still uncertain about how to finance. I hope to get a few hints here about what we might not have considered yet or thought-provoking ideas that might steer our decision one way or the other.
My partner and I are both self-employed; her work (physio) is currently reduced because of our two kids (kindergarten age), I have been working as a freelance engineer for 10 years. Monthly net income in recent years has always been slightly over €5,000. She will contribute significantly again at the earliest in one year. Baukindergeld probably does not apply as in one of the applicable years we were just above the limit.
We want to buy a nearly new existing property in NRW for about €420,000 (including real estate transfer tax and notary, no broker fees, no investments needed in the next years according to the building surveyor). We can provide equity of about €110,000 to get below 80% loan-to-value. The required loan amount is therefore about €310,000. To get below 75% for the next cheaper interest rate level, we would have to invest our remaining financial buffer, which is possible but probably reckless.

We now have several offers from the financial intermediary that have been assessed as feasible by the providers considering our conditions. Based on our circumstances, we calculate that a monthly rate of about €1,500 is currently easily manageable. It will be easier in the future when the second income returns and childcare costs disappear.

The supposedly cheapest offers always come from DSL Bank. Once as a 20-year full annuity loan with 1.78% and a rate of €1,526. However, without special repayment options. Total interest payment then just over €59,000.
The next best offer for a 20-year fixed interest rate as a non-full annuity loan with special prepayment option and repayment change option is already over 2%, making it rather uninteresting.

For 15 years fixed interest rate, DSL Bank offers 1.73% at a €1,480 rate, or 1.72% at €1,348. Rate changes up to 3 times free of charge, but only upwards, not downwards. Special repayment up to 5% annually.
Then there is also Ing-Diba with 1.75% at a rate around €1,500. Repayment changes 2 times free between 1% and 10% possible. Special repayment up to 5% annually.

Offers from Volksbank and Sparkasse are well above 2%, so it will probably come down to one of the direct banks via the intermediary.
Ing-Diba is actually too expensive for 15 years fixed in comparison to the 20-year full annuity loan from DSL Bank. On the other hand, one often reads much negative about DSL Bank, mostly in connection with construction financing where the loan is paid out gradually.
Nevertheless, my gut feeling is more with Ing-Diba. You never know what will come, and if things get worse, the repayment change downwards would be possible in an emergency, and if things go better, there is the special prepayment option to reduce interest burden. Without special prepayment and with constant repayment, the remaining debt after 15 years would be about €97,000, with the same rate as the full annuity loan even somewhat less. In about three years we will still get a building savings contract with about €20,000 savings balance then, retrospectively better interest, which could still be used for special repayment. If we can use further special repayments, the remaining debt could be pushed down even further. Then, for example, €50,000 in the follow-up financing after 15 years would not break our neck even with increased rates. Could only be more expensive than the full annuity loan in the worst case at the end.

What do you think: Better the supposedly safe full annuity loan but without the option to reduce the rate in bad times, investing available capital in good times instead? Or bet that we can repay properly over the next 15 years and maybe even get a better deal?
 

dab_dab

2019-01-24 17:53:13
  • #2
Regarding Baukindergeld: To my knowledge, the average from the two assessment years counts; exceeding it slightly once does not necessarily have to be an exclusion criterion.
 

HilfeHilfe

2019-01-24 17:57:19
  • #3
Well, you have to know that, you have a solid income and [seine Lebensgefährtin] will soon have an income again. From a gut feeling I would say take the 15 years, ing offers special repayments.
 

face26

2019-01-24 17:57:56
  • #4
Hi ,

You have a great starting position. If you have chosen the 1500 as a rate for yourselves in such a way that it is still a comfortable rate, then you also have a buffer for "bad times". If I were in your position, I would take the 20-year full repayment plan. With an existing property purchase and full repayment, you hardly have any contact with the bank anyway. Mathematically, it may be that another option would have been better in the end, but who knows what interest rates will do in 15 years from now. 1.78 for 20 years is a great interest rate and you never have to worry about it again from the start. By the way, after 10 years you always have the right to terminate. So if you are drowning in money, you can pay it all back or parts of it anyway. This repayment change... I don't know what everyone always expects from it. Yes, it appears to be a flexible solution. I don't believe it is often used. Why? Because you can pay more anyway after 10 years and hardly anyone increases a rate. Lowering the rate or repayment... the bank still has to agree to that first. Many forget that you can do this free of charge but the bank still has to check if it's okay. So when "bad times" come, the question is whether the bank will even let you lower the repayment. Therefore, 20 years full repayment and live comfortably.
 

nordanney

2019-01-24 18:30:39
  • #5
Special repayment is unnecessary anyway, since you have a full repayment loan. Otherwise, the bank's refinancing wouldn't work out.

The interest rate difference between 15 years and 20 years is marginal. Even a small increase in interest rates is enough for you to end up paying more interest.
Special repayment is rarely used, since usually more important things come up than the straightforward ongoing financing (at least that's how it is with us).

I would take the full repayment loan. After 10.5 years, you have a special termination right anyway. A rate reduction is practically included too – before the bank terminates, a pragmatic solution is always sought – e.g., rate reduction or deferral or...
 

Airea

2019-01-24 21:20:17
  • #6
These are already helpful answers that alleviate our concerns, thank you very much. Thanks also for the tip about [Baukindergeld], but even on average for 2016/2017, we are just above the limit. However, that's not a big deal for us if families who need it more than we do receive it.
 

Similar topics
03.05.2011KfW loan okay or is there a cheaper option?10
03.06.2015Loan interest rate with 15 years fixed interest period?35
20.01.2016What interest rate do you pay on your construction financing?25
05.02.2016Is a construction financing advisor present?58
17.06.2018Finally financing approval and 2nd offer12
31.07.2018For how many years of fixed interest period would you currently finance?57
03.12.2021Financing a condominium: full repayment or not?29
28.02.2023Evaluation of Savings Bank Interest Offer17

Oben