Kati2022
2022-01-15 18:29:09
- #1
We are finished with the planning for the most part. The building application has been submitted. Now it goes into the details.
We started with the windows and are stuck. I hope you and especially you can help us.
It's about our floor-to-ceiling aluminum windows in the main room. Both are planned as lift-and-slide door windows. Clear ceiling height 270 cm, window height 240 cm. We do not want a corner window – the static calculations would be too complicated. It was agreed with the structural engineer that a 24x24 concrete support column plus insulation will go into the corner. (The picture still shows a longer masonry wall – but this will be changed.) Which solution should we choose for the roller shutter boxes?
a) Recessed box matching the masonry made of Poroton. The problem here is the lack of bearing surface on the side of the concrete support.
b) Recessed box made of EPS (36.5 cm, width matching the brick), which is flush with the window, meaning it does not need a bearing surface.
c) Double the window by 30 cm and use a 15 cm wide metal roller shutter box. This could then be ordered either recessed or facade-flush with a visible metal cover.
d) Instead of doubling the window frame, install an approximately 18 cm wide lintel: 3.5 cm EPS + 15 cm metal roller shutter box
....
Of course, we would prefer floor-to-ceiling windows in the main room – 270 cm. Leaving aside the additional costs now... With this solution, I could only take surface-mounted roller shutters.
What do you think? There would be an undeveloped southwest side in front with a large field/orchard meadow. How do surface-mounted roller shutters behave in the wind?
Do you perhaps have another solution? – what do you think as an expert?

We started with the windows and are stuck. I hope you and especially you can help us.
It's about our floor-to-ceiling aluminum windows in the main room. Both are planned as lift-and-slide door windows. Clear ceiling height 270 cm, window height 240 cm. We do not want a corner window – the static calculations would be too complicated. It was agreed with the structural engineer that a 24x24 concrete support column plus insulation will go into the corner. (The picture still shows a longer masonry wall – but this will be changed.) Which solution should we choose for the roller shutter boxes?
a) Recessed box matching the masonry made of Poroton. The problem here is the lack of bearing surface on the side of the concrete support.
b) Recessed box made of EPS (36.5 cm, width matching the brick), which is flush with the window, meaning it does not need a bearing surface.
c) Double the window by 30 cm and use a 15 cm wide metal roller shutter box. This could then be ordered either recessed or facade-flush with a visible metal cover.
d) Instead of doubling the window frame, install an approximately 18 cm wide lintel: 3.5 cm EPS + 15 cm metal roller shutter box
....
Of course, we would prefer floor-to-ceiling windows in the main room – 270 cm. Leaving aside the additional costs now... With this solution, I could only take surface-mounted roller shutters.
What do you think? There would be an undeveloped southwest side in front with a large field/orchard meadow. How do surface-mounted roller shutters behave in the wind?
Do you perhaps have another solution? – what do you think as an expert?