Type of use in the land register. Holiday home rentable or not?

Does the type of use determine whether a property/building can be rented out?

If you had searched for "Grundbuch" and "Nutzungsart" in this forum, this thread would not have existed at all. Please try to inform yourself better in advance so that you do not alienate even the last willing-to-inform users. The type of use in the land register has no building law significance. Neither can the permissibility of the existing use be derived from it, nor can the future possible use be inferred. It is only a snapshot of the actual use recorded at a more or less random point in time.

I’m afraid that if the Kärcher Surfsee in Biblis – which I already pointed out to you – does not offer you enough freedom, then there is no help for you in Germany. I don’t know anything more alternative.

Does this mean that a "hunting lodge" may not be rented out to weekend guests because it does not count as a "holiday home"?

To build a hunting lodge, you first have to be a hunting tenant, which you will only be able to achieve with a hunting license. Once you’ve reached that point, you may also hand over the key to other hunters. They then don’t have to search for marmot tracks and count hare droppings all day, but may also cuddle with their huntress or play cards.

Just put it all into one thread already, the experts answer you the same there, and it's easier for everyone to read.

Not quite: if I’ve counted correctly, four threads deal with the issue, three of them concern a specific property and the fourth a hypothetical one. So from that perspective it’s two different topics.

It is only the snapshot of the actual use recorded at a more or less random time.

Whereby the snapshot "outer area" and "no development plan in preparation" can be safely interpreted as an indication that the spatial planning intention does not want to allow holiday homes there for the foreseeable future.

Thank you for the tip, but from experience this usually leads to a big mess and my questions get answered even less :/

Not only from experience, but it can actually be seen here that your threads are already on page 2 always finished or mixed up. For you, the concept of a discussion also seems to be new: someone asks, another or several answer, upon which the questioner (in this case YOU) follows up with further questions and explanations in the same thread: the discussion builds up and grows. Anyone who wants to participate can scroll, flip through and re-read to provide more information or ask further questions. This is practically no longer possible with your problem in this forum, since you open a new thread every time. That won't work.

The problem is that it does little to "diminish" the impact on others if someone is "only" an Ermeintesnichtsotroll instead of a Vorsatztroll

The problem is that it does little to diminish the impact on others if someone is "only" a presumed nothing-troll instead of a deliberate troll

Dear moderators. I request the deletion of this user. I do not need to be called a troll – alongside the answers that make me look ridiculous. "Forenregeln

Wir weisen Sie hiermit ausdrücklich darauf hin, dass Zuwiderhandlungen unter Umständen die umgehende und nicht widerrufbare Sperrung Ihres Accounts und gegebenenfalls auch die Löschung Ihrer Beiträge auf Hausbau-Forum.de zur Folge haben kann!

Netiquette

2.1) Keine Beleidigungen
Benutzern oder öffentlich gestellten Personen, Firmen oder Organisationen ist mit Respekt entgegenzutreten. Bezeichnungen wie Penner, Mistladen, usw. sind zu unterlassen"

You have already received the answer to the question about the outer area.
If FOREST is listed in the land register, you are located in the middle of nowhere and there really are thousands of trees growing there, you can assume that you are indeed in a forest and not in a city with building plots. That sounds like the outer area again, and there, residential development on the property is not allowed. If there is a hut there, there must be a reason why it is allowed to stand there. However, it will not be a normal residential house. And therefore, renting it out should also not be an option – regardless of the fact that you – no matter what absurd ideas you pursue, I at least do not understand your intentions throughout all the threads – would then also have to define a target group that would occasionally like to spend the night in the middle of nowhere.

What exactly is driving you? Troll or what are the motives?

You have already received the answer to the question about the outer area.
If FOREST is listed in the land register, you are located in the middle of nowhere and there really are thousands of trees growing there, you can assume that you are indeed in a forest and not in a city with building plots. That sounds like the outer area again, and there, residential development on the property is not allowed. If there is a hut there, there must be a reason why it is allowed to stand there. However, it will not be a normal residential house. And therefore, renting it out should also not be an option – regardless of the fact that you – no matter what absurd ideas you pursue, I at least do not understand your intentions throughout all the threads – would then also have to define a target group that would occasionally like to spend the night in the middle of nowhere.

What exactly is driving you? Troll or what are the motives?

Dear moderators. I request the deletion of this user. I do not need to be called a troll – in addition to the answers ridiculing me.

"Forum rules

We expressly point out that violations may lead to the immediate and irrevocable suspension of your account and, if applicable, to the deletion of your posts on Hausbau-Forum.de!

Netiquette

2.1) No insults
Users or publicly identified persons, companies, or organizations must be treated with respect. Terms such as bum, lousy place, etc. must be avoided"