Hhanghaus2000 2021-06-23 13:48:13#2Yes. Such important information as FFH 60 cm above existing ground and retaining walls max 60 cm height could have been provided first. Who changed the arrow of the ridge direction? It was originally parallel to the street. Please clarify what applies. With a floor area ratio of 0.3, it might become quite tight with the bungalow.
Yes. Such important information as FFH 60 cm above existing ground and retaining walls max 60 cm height could have been provided first. Who changed the arrow of the ridge direction? It was originally parallel to the street. Please clarify what applies. With a floor area ratio of 0.3, it might become quite tight with the bungalow.
MMR___MR 2021-06-23 13:51:44#3what does that mean now ???? Is that good or bad ???? The ridge direction is parallel to the street
Hhanghaus2000 2021-06-23 14:01:51#4That is not bad, since the plot is rather flat. But that also means that your floor plan belongs in the trash.
That is not bad, since the plot is rather flat. But that also means that your floor plan belongs in the trash.
111ant 2021-06-23 14:04:14#5 But that also says that your floor plan belongs in the trash. From my perspective, not because of ridge direction reasons ;-)
But that also says that your floor plan belongs in the trash. From my perspective, not because of ridge direction reasons ;-)
MMR___MR 2021-06-23 14:06:42#6Is it allowed to straighten it now? Or is there anything speaking against it, and if so, how can it be done best?
Is it allowed to straighten it now? Or is there anything speaking against it, and if so, how can it be done best?
