Whisky2k2
2016-11-07 12:13:03
- #1
Hello,
we want to avoid using Styrofoam in our house. Multipor would probably allow for a more robust facade without Styrofoam, but our builder has no experience with it and would already charge an extra >5,000€ for mineral wool.
The house is 1.5 stories high and offers 160 sqm. The builder uses 24 cm aerated concrete and 12 cm ETICS as standard. For 36.5 cm aerated concrete, we would get 3,100€ reimbursed and thus meet the Energy Saving Ordinance 2016. For KfW 55, according to the builder, a 48 cm aerated concrete with lambda 0.08 and thicker insulation of the base slab would be necessary. This results in an extra cost of about 12,000€.
Is the difference between KfW 70/Energy Saving Ordinance 2016 and KfW 55 really that significant? According to the Ytong flyer, KfW 55 should be possible with a 42.5 cm block with lambda 0.08.
We have a similar issue with the heat pump. A air heat pump is included as standard. We would like to switch to geothermal. The builder offers deep drilling and brine heat pump for an extra 9,500€. Motivated by the threads in the forum, we wanted to install a trench collector on our own. However, in that case, we would only get 6,800€ reimbursed for the eliminated drilling. Therefore, we would probably take the drilling after all and rely on BAFA funding.
Are these prices realistically related?
Thanks and regards Christian
we want to avoid using Styrofoam in our house. Multipor would probably allow for a more robust facade without Styrofoam, but our builder has no experience with it and would already charge an extra >5,000€ for mineral wool.
The house is 1.5 stories high and offers 160 sqm. The builder uses 24 cm aerated concrete and 12 cm ETICS as standard. For 36.5 cm aerated concrete, we would get 3,100€ reimbursed and thus meet the Energy Saving Ordinance 2016. For KfW 55, according to the builder, a 48 cm aerated concrete with lambda 0.08 and thicker insulation of the base slab would be necessary. This results in an extra cost of about 12,000€.
Is the difference between KfW 70/Energy Saving Ordinance 2016 and KfW 55 really that significant? According to the Ytong flyer, KfW 55 should be possible with a 42.5 cm block with lambda 0.08.
We have a similar issue with the heat pump. A air heat pump is included as standard. We would like to switch to geothermal. The builder offers deep drilling and brine heat pump for an extra 9,500€. Motivated by the threads in the forum, we wanted to install a trench collector on our own. However, in that case, we would only get 6,800€ reimbursed for the eliminated drilling. Therefore, we would probably take the drilling after all and rely on BAFA funding.
Are these prices realistically related?
Thanks and regards Christian