AnNaHF79
2016-12-26 11:53:27
- #1
Hello,
we are still at the very beginning of our construction project, but since such an investment needs to be well considered, we want to inform ourselves early and exchange ideas with experts. For this purpose, we have already browsed a lot on the internet, especially here in the forum, and ordered some of the literature recommended here and elsewhere.
A fundamental question we are currently asking ourselves regarding [Massiv-Fertighaus]:
a) Prefabricated house
b) Prefabricated house in solid construction
c) Solid construction (through a developer)
We don’t want to build cheaply, but well.
Sustainability is important to us; what we build should last long and still stand in 100 years (in my opinion a point against an old-fashioned prefabricated house).
Living comfort is equally important; that means a good room climate, good sound insulation, etc. (in my opinion also a point against a prefab house). Energy efficiency is also important to us.
Healthy living as well.
Above all, however, low risks and efforts.
What scares us on the other hand about solid construction through a developer:
The effort; we have little desire and especially no time to constantly argue with the developer and the craftsmen.
We want to outsource a project and hope that everything then simply runs – of course, it probably won’t run that smoothly, certain efforts will inevitably arise, but we want to keep these at least low. A manageable construction period without major risks would be very welcome to us.
The fact that prefabricated houses have been "proven" by being built multiple times, in our opinion, reduces the risks of something fundamentally going wrong.
Based on the previous statements, we ask ourselves whether a solid prefabricated house might be the right choice for us because it combines the best of both worlds?
- Fast construction time
- Low risks due to proven construction (with coordination of building services such as heating system, etc.)
- Still sustainable if the right materials and construction methods are chosen
- Good insulation
- House can be viewed beforehand as a show house
- Often available with insurance/warranties for maximum security
- etc.
How do you see this?
If this should represent a viable path, the question arises as to what the right materials and construction methods would be and which provider might be suitable...
Materials:
- Clay (expanded clay)
- Brick (Unipor/Poroton)
- Aerated concrete (Ytong)
- Clay bricks
- Sand-lime brick
- "Special stuff" like Duotherm (reinforced concrete?), Klimapor, Ökodomo, etc.
Clay bricks and sand-lime bricks seem to have rather poor thermal insulation.
Also, clay bricks seem to absorb moisture easily.
Therefore, I would rather sort out these options.
Construction method:
Here we favor a stone-on-stone construction on site, which apparently also exists for prefab houses (Hartl?) or at least a construction method based on it that promises sustainability.
Experiences/tips?
Thank you.
we are still at the very beginning of our construction project, but since such an investment needs to be well considered, we want to inform ourselves early and exchange ideas with experts. For this purpose, we have already browsed a lot on the internet, especially here in the forum, and ordered some of the literature recommended here and elsewhere.
A fundamental question we are currently asking ourselves regarding [Massiv-Fertighaus]:
a) Prefabricated house
b) Prefabricated house in solid construction
c) Solid construction (through a developer)
We don’t want to build cheaply, but well.
Sustainability is important to us; what we build should last long and still stand in 100 years (in my opinion a point against an old-fashioned prefabricated house).
Living comfort is equally important; that means a good room climate, good sound insulation, etc. (in my opinion also a point against a prefab house). Energy efficiency is also important to us.
Healthy living as well.
Above all, however, low risks and efforts.
What scares us on the other hand about solid construction through a developer:
The effort; we have little desire and especially no time to constantly argue with the developer and the craftsmen.
We want to outsource a project and hope that everything then simply runs – of course, it probably won’t run that smoothly, certain efforts will inevitably arise, but we want to keep these at least low. A manageable construction period without major risks would be very welcome to us.
The fact that prefabricated houses have been "proven" by being built multiple times, in our opinion, reduces the risks of something fundamentally going wrong.
Based on the previous statements, we ask ourselves whether a solid prefabricated house might be the right choice for us because it combines the best of both worlds?
- Fast construction time
- Low risks due to proven construction (with coordination of building services such as heating system, etc.)
- Still sustainable if the right materials and construction methods are chosen
- Good insulation
- House can be viewed beforehand as a show house
- Often available with insurance/warranties for maximum security
- etc.
How do you see this?
If this should represent a viable path, the question arises as to what the right materials and construction methods would be and which provider might be suitable...
Materials:
- Clay (expanded clay)
- Brick (Unipor/Poroton)
- Aerated concrete (Ytong)
- Clay bricks
- Sand-lime brick
- "Special stuff" like Duotherm (reinforced concrete?), Klimapor, Ökodomo, etc.
Clay bricks and sand-lime bricks seem to have rather poor thermal insulation.
Also, clay bricks seem to absorb moisture easily.
Therefore, I would rather sort out these options.
Construction method:
Here we favor a stone-on-stone construction on site, which apparently also exists for prefab houses (Hartl?) or at least a construction method based on it that promises sustainability.
Experiences/tips?
Thank you.