Solid house construction - choosing the "right" stone

reasons for why red included, among others: [...]
For the white stone, it was "advertised" with:

Every stone / wall construction has – solely because they differ in some properties – pros and cons, of which a majority are at least apparently objective, comprehensible, and partly significant arguments. On balance, however, it unfortunately remains:

The discussion unfortunately tends to become religious.

... and sometimes even continues among people who introduce their statement of fact with ...

If someone argues with hazardous waste, you should mentally switch off already.

No, if he argues, then not.

My mantra, as in all posts on this topic, is: "if you have found out that with company X ‘the chemistry matches’, but they routinely build with stone A, then don't let them practice on your house how they handle stone B". Of course, you can also filter by who prefers the stone / wall construction with the best datasheet values. But for this criterion you should give fewer points than for "does the owner give the impression of a serious livestock trader". Use the advantage that with regional suppliers your visits to concrete reference builders are short. Pay most attention to the statements of comparable reference builders (age and income group as well as family situation roughly matching yours) and select those who have built according to today's standards (> 2014) and those for which defects would already show due to the age of the building.

Hello everyone,

Thank you already for your experiences and assessments. As a layperson, one sometimes feels rather helpless in the face of the statements from the property developers.

Therefore, my question.

Best regards

Developer

You mean a constructioncontractor. A constructiondeveloper sells you a house built on his land.

Take advantage of the fact that with regional providers, your routes to specific reference builders are also short. Pay the most attention to the statements of comparable reference builders (age and income group as well as family situation roughly matching yours) and choose those who have built according to today's standards (> 2014) and those where defects would already be visible due to the age of the property.

It's just pure theory, right, because how are you supposed to get to the references? In practice, it's usually much more difficult than forums..

Yes, I meant construction company - sorry...

It's just pure theory, right, because how are you supposed to get the references? The practice is usually much more difficult than forums..

The practice is not that difficult after all, I didn't just casually blabber this tip out of the blue but - also through questions here in the forum - have regular practice in this kind of research. I quite often come across providers who present themselves in an exemplary transparent way for the reference-seeking prospective builders.
"References" for me are not folders with thank you letters that differ from love letters only by the missing ribbon (Dr. W. and Mrs. from L. say: "Mr. M. and his architect K. built us the most beautiful house in the world"). Rather, real photos of customer houses with postal codes and town names - the rest is then told to me by a search engine with aerial images - and/or corresponding construction site picture galleries. I say, if you keep your eyes open you see quite a lot