Thank you very much for the quick reply.
Coincidence, since I am just nearby. ;)
Yes, mechanically it is good only.....
We are planning a house with a shed roof, and on the larger half photovoltaic and vacuum tubes. Roof area completely occupied.
That would overall be a matter for specialist advice. Just this much: solar thermal systems are economically sensible in very few cases of private use (single-family house...German prefabricated house holding).
Why solar thermal systems are still frequently used is best known by the creator of the Energy Saving Ordinance or KfW certificate. In commercial use with continuous hot water consumption, on the other hand, it looks completely different. There, solar thermal systems also make economic sense. Here I come to about 30% utilization of the irradiated solar energy, while in the private sector, depending on use, about 6...7% are actually usable. Therefore, for private use it is not unreasonable to focus on photovoltaics. Here, the problems of thermal use of solar energy (thermal storage resistance) can largely be avoided.
The pitch of a shed roof is naturally lower than the optimal inclination angle for photovoltaic systems or solar thermal systems. With full use of the projected base area, this inevitably leads to partial shading of the modules! So a sensible spacing regulation actually applies. In this respect, there would already be room for a mechanical solution. The simplest case would be: exit hatch and, if necessary, a broom in hand. A technical heating system will usually render the investment absurd (balancing).
Best regards.