Single-storey calculation exceeded - possibilities?

Faktisch hat tomtom79 aber Recht ;) ... 1.59 cm to 1.52 cm

In reality, he was not right. I guess everyone knows it was meant differently ;)

: Thank you for the reply!

@tomto79: You received today the award for the most unqualified answer. Congratulations! If you have nothing meaningful to contribute, then just don't. Keep letting the others push you around as before. Yes, hard to believe, but there are also people who question things and verify information. You should start doing that too... it helps in life from time to time.

I could respond now, but I'd rather go admire my attic rooms without knee walls. Because it was deliberately chosen that way.

In fact, tomtom79 is right ;) ... 1.59 cm to 1.52 cm

My goodness! And I thought I was picky. And since there is no room for other users above me from a picky perspective, I would like to point out: is also factually wrong, because it would be only 0.7mm and according to the OP's information even only 0.65mm, whereby we are already venturing into realms that have so far only been open to mechanical engineers.

: Thanks for your answer!

A click on "like" would have sufficed for that. It’s a pity that you have nothing more to say about it.

Kids…

It is obvious that there is definitely a typo there and that the difference from 1.59m to 1.525m is 6.5 cm, right?

Nevertheless, I would first think about to what extent this leads to disadvantages. If you can no longer get out of bed, a desired piece of furniture can no longer be placed, what are the practical life consequences of the change?

If nothing changes there, one would have to further consider to what extent the effort and return of countermeasures are in relation to each other.

Right, it was never about millimeters...

1.59 and 1.52 are 7 cm.

Thank you for the clarification chand1986! :-)