Sell an apartment from a two-family house immediately after completion

  • Erstellt am 2021-11-10 18:06:09

Bob der B

2021-11-10 18:06:09
  • #1
Hello home builder,

I have a building plot but cannot/will not afford to build a single-family house on it. What is it like if I have a two-family house built on it and sell one residential unit again shortly after completion? This would make my remaining residential unit significantly cheaper (after I have of course advanced the construction of the second residential unit).

Specific questions:
1. Is the KFW funding tied to a condition that I must keep both residential units for a certain period?
2.a) Is there a way to minimize/avoid the speculation tax? One approach would be, for example, to live in both apartments for the first two years and then sell one.
2.b) Referring to the attached picture: When do the 2 years of owner-occupation begin? Is time possibly counted here when I was the landowner without a property on it?
3) Does anyone have experience with selling a new apartment shortly after completion and have some tips ready?

Many thanks and greetings from Bob
 

Fuchur

2021-11-10 18:21:39
  • #2
To my knowledge, the sale is also tax-free if there was exclusively owner-occupation from construction to sale, even if that is less than 2 years.



No, from the completion of the building, but see first answer.
 

Benutzer200

2021-11-10 18:31:25
  • #3
No. But keep in mind that the buyer then cannot receive any subsidy. Therefore, he will pay you a slightly lower price. Give and take... If you manage to live in two apartments simultaneously and can credibly and plausibly demonstrate this to the tax office (there are no stupid people working there!), then yes. But I doubt that. Or can children live in the apartment? Then it would be equivalent to owner-occupation, provided the children appear on your tax return (child benefits, etc.). BUT: After two years you sell a used apartment and not a new build. In the worst case (currently purchase prices are partly declining and I do not assume prices will continue to rise sky-high) the depreciation is greater than the saved speculation tax. Be glad if you have to pay taxes, because that means you first earned good money and later, despite taxes, more than before. Part 1: There is no 2-year period Part 2: No Sell like any other property. Sold within 24 hours without a realtor in a good location.
 

Tarnari

2021-11-10 21:19:42
  • #4
Careful, I’m about to make myself unpopular… If you can’t/won’t afford it, then don’t do it. I also believe that the forum should not provide assistance for that. These rules have their reasons and that’s a good thing. There are specialists for that. It doesn’t make the situation better if living space becomes a speculative object, but at least someone has earned from it.

Why don’t you find someone who buys half of the property and you build a double half together?
 

Zubi123

2021-11-10 23:46:26
  • #5


In my opinion, there is indeed a 10-year period with KfW funding. At least there is one for the provision of residential units. How does it look in case of a sale?



You could first complete one residential unit and move in there. Then you finish the second residential unit and move. Then a sale of the first residential unit is not taxable because you exclusively used the first apartment yourself (no retention period required).
 

Benutzer200

2021-11-11 08:29:28
  • #6

The property itself must remain in the KfW condition for 10 years. Example: The buyer of the apartment feels the apartment does not "breathe" enough and simply has glazed windows installed that are quite drafty like in the past. Then the apartment is no longer in the approved KfW condition and KfW could demand the funding back.
Therefore, the purchase contract includes a clause that the buyer agrees to maintain the apartment in the KfW condition during the period. You then pass on your obligations.
Otherwise, there are no restrictions from KfW. That is why developers can pocket the funding for themselves and you, as a buyer, end up empty-handed.

The tax office might not go along with that if it thinks it through. Because moving just to save taxes, from one place to another, could be interpreted negatively. Could be, but doesn't have to be.
 

Similar topics
27.02.2015Is property financing feasible?56
22.12.2015KFW 70 funding still in 201524
16.02.2016Question about contractual completion14
03.09.2016Buy the kitchen more than a year before completion?54
07.10.2016BAFA funding tips38
04.08.2016Number of residential units according to the Building Code14
30.09.2018BAFA funding for air-water heat pumps in new construction - how does it work?30
10.12.2017Second residential unit in the house due to KfW funding 15313
19.08.2018Strategically well-planned handover completion under building supervision11
22.06.2020Is KfW funding with repayment grant possible for me?16
02.07.2020Speculation tax on leasehold27
18.11.2021KfW funding for KfW 40 Plus houses from now and from 01.07.202157
24.01.2022BEG funding for Efficiency House 55 in new construction will be discontinued66
06.09.2022KFW 461 - Complete renovation to energy-efficient house - Residential units17
02.08.2022Heat pump not available - funding gone?30
29.11.2022Support for materials with own contribution19
07.01.2024KfW Funding Climate-Friendly Residential Building from March 2023152
06.09.2023Semi-detached house with 2-3 residential units17
31.10.2024KFW 300 Funding - Attractiveness23
11.01.2025KfW 300 funding upon disposal of real estate ownership10

Oben