Mottenhausen
2019-10-02 15:09:29
- #1
So risk versus money.
Compare both worst-case variants financially:
Variant A: 2 - 3 months longer rental period = xxxx€ rent "lost"
Variant B: 2 - 3 months transitional accommodations, additional costs for double moves, storage, problems with re-registering residence at authorities, insurance, etc. = xxxx€ "lost"
Which variant seems more expensive to you?
By the way: it's a shame about the finished outdoor facilities if the sewage service imposes the requirement to build another handover and collection shaft on the property, with the excavator rolling in again in February to dig a 4m deep hole right in the middle, unfortunately cutting through the telephone line and ultimately having to dig up the entire garden. All of this can happen.
Compare both worst-case variants financially:
Variant A: 2 - 3 months longer rental period = xxxx€ rent "lost"
Variant B: 2 - 3 months transitional accommodations, additional costs for double moves, storage, problems with re-registering residence at authorities, insurance, etc. = xxxx€ "lost"
Which variant seems more expensive to you?
By the way: it's a shame about the finished outdoor facilities if the sewage service imposes the requirement to build another handover and collection shaft on the property, with the excavator rolling in again in February to dig a 4m deep hole right in the middle, unfortunately cutting through the telephone line and ultimately having to dig up the entire garden. All of this can happen.