fL0ooor
2019-08-18 12:31:17
- #1
Hello,
we are currently building a single-family house with a general contractor (GU). At the end of the month, the screed will be installed. I have now received an additional offer from my GU for the extra costs of our tile selection. For the ground floor, we chose 20x1.20cm tiles. Due to the larger format than what was originally included in the scope of services, additional costs arise. So far, so good.
However, the additional offer explicitly recommended an uncoupling membrane (Ditra membrane) because of the large-format tiles. If this service is not accepted, the GU does not provide any warranty for the tiles. According to my research, the uncoupling membrane does not refer to any DIN standard. After inquiring with the GU, they also only base their recommendation on the Tile Industry Association.
Regarding 1.3.: "On the building physics conditions"
For large-format tiles from 60x60 cm, in addition to the contact layer and the rapid adhesive, the executing specialist company also recommends uncoupling in the form of a Ditra membrane. The uncoupling membranes separate the subfloor and floor coverings from each other. They absorb movements and thus prevent stress cracks. The larger the tiles are, the greater the risk. Therefore, when laying large-format tiles, we already point out in advance the additional effort compared to standard formats (15x15 cm, 45x45 cm, 30x60 cm) in terms of installation.
The statement from the Tile and Natural Stone Association within the Central Association of the German Construction Industry can confirm this again: "During installation, the building physics conditions of the different substrate types must be observed as a mandatory condition. The coefficients of expansion of cement screeds and calcium sulfate flow screeds/poured asphalt screeds are significantly higher than those of ceramic tiles and slabs and natural stone tiles. The shape changes originating from the substrate can be only very limitedly compensated for by the small joint proportion and joint width. Therefore, for large-format tiles, additional stress-relieving measures may be necessary."
How do you assess this argumentation? I still believe that the uncoupling membrane does not refer to any DIN standard and that therefore, with a proper screed, the warranty cannot be denied.
I would be happy to receive your feedback!
we are currently building a single-family house with a general contractor (GU). At the end of the month, the screed will be installed. I have now received an additional offer from my GU for the extra costs of our tile selection. For the ground floor, we chose 20x1.20cm tiles. Due to the larger format than what was originally included in the scope of services, additional costs arise. So far, so good.
However, the additional offer explicitly recommended an uncoupling membrane (Ditra membrane) because of the large-format tiles. If this service is not accepted, the GU does not provide any warranty for the tiles. According to my research, the uncoupling membrane does not refer to any DIN standard. After inquiring with the GU, they also only base their recommendation on the Tile Industry Association.
Regarding 1.3.: "On the building physics conditions"
For large-format tiles from 60x60 cm, in addition to the contact layer and the rapid adhesive, the executing specialist company also recommends uncoupling in the form of a Ditra membrane. The uncoupling membranes separate the subfloor and floor coverings from each other. They absorb movements and thus prevent stress cracks. The larger the tiles are, the greater the risk. Therefore, when laying large-format tiles, we already point out in advance the additional effort compared to standard formats (15x15 cm, 45x45 cm, 30x60 cm) in terms of installation.
The statement from the Tile and Natural Stone Association within the Central Association of the German Construction Industry can confirm this again: "During installation, the building physics conditions of the different substrate types must be observed as a mandatory condition. The coefficients of expansion of cement screeds and calcium sulfate flow screeds/poured asphalt screeds are significantly higher than those of ceramic tiles and slabs and natural stone tiles. The shape changes originating from the substrate can be only very limitedly compensated for by the small joint proportion and joint width. Therefore, for large-format tiles, additional stress-relieving measures may be necessary."
How do you assess this argumentation? I still believe that the uncoupling membrane does not refer to any DIN standard and that therefore, with a proper screed, the warranty cannot be denied.
I would be happy to receive your feedback!