Riepirat
2016-09-23 10:47:33
- #1
Hello dear forum,
we are currently planning our single-family house. It will be 1.5 stories with a gable roof.
For aesthetic reasons, we would like visible flying rafters and profiled foot, middle, and ridge purlin heads. The roof structure should be made of structural solid wood.
We already have two offers for this. However, they differ in the visible cladding above the rafters.
One provider says that only profiled wood makes sense here (and apparently he cannot do it differently), since these then lie on the rafters but below the roof battens. Otherwise, he would not give a warranty. The expansion behavior regarding plastic would be too different, so that in the case of plastic profile boards these might possibly break.
The other provider, however, offers plastic profile boards as standard.
Due to less maintenance over the years and without weather effects, the plastic profile boards actually seem more convincing to us. It is certainly also cheaper than investing in expensive paint every few years.
What surprises us is that the first provider generally rejects this from a construction engineering point of view and believes that it is technically not possible. Does the second provider perhaps build differently and master newer methods?
We would be very happy about opinions and experiences.
Best regards Riepirat
we are currently planning our single-family house. It will be 1.5 stories with a gable roof.
For aesthetic reasons, we would like visible flying rafters and profiled foot, middle, and ridge purlin heads. The roof structure should be made of structural solid wood.
We already have two offers for this. However, they differ in the visible cladding above the rafters.
One provider says that only profiled wood makes sense here (and apparently he cannot do it differently), since these then lie on the rafters but below the roof battens. Otherwise, he would not give a warranty. The expansion behavior regarding plastic would be too different, so that in the case of plastic profile boards these might possibly break.
The other provider, however, offers plastic profile boards as standard.
Due to less maintenance over the years and without weather effects, the plastic profile boards actually seem more convincing to us. It is certainly also cheaper than investing in expensive paint every few years.
What surprises us is that the first provider generally rejects this from a construction engineering point of view and believes that it is technically not possible. Does the second provider perhaps build differently and master newer methods?
We would be very happy about opinions and experiences.
Best regards Riepirat