Projekt 2012
2012-02-26 18:46:27
- #1
Hello everyone,
Over the past few weeks, I have read thoroughly through this forum and was impressed by the many helpful tips and information!! That is why I registered here today to participate in the discussions and exchange of experiences!!
I am also planning to build a prefabricated house and have already had some contact with consultants from various companies... One consultant informed me that his company generally requires a financing confirmation with a guarantee certificate from the bank of the builder covering at least 70% of the contract sum! Thanks to the posts here in the forum, I was at least sensitized to this issue and possible risks (e.g., payments despite defects or services not rendered) and would like to find out,
a) whether the clauses mentioned below are among those that are advised against
b) whether such clauses are now standard (after the relevant Federal Court of Justice ruling)
c) or whether I should be "concerned" about having been with the "right construction company"
For example, the guarantee certificate states among other things:
"Builder instructs bank to transfer to construction company according to the following payment schedule (percentages according to construction progress follow)"
"Builder's bank assumes the suretyship for all payment obligations incumbent on the builder as a primary debtor, waiving the objection of prior enforcement..."
"Bank of the builder waives the objection of contestability and set-off, provided the builder’s right of contestation / counterclaim is neither undisputed nor legally established..."
What is to be made of this? Are such formulations common? Is this an assignment of claims??
Thanks for your opinions!!!
Regards
"the Newcomer"
Project 2012
Over the past few weeks, I have read thoroughly through this forum and was impressed by the many helpful tips and information!! That is why I registered here today to participate in the discussions and exchange of experiences!!
I am also planning to build a prefabricated house and have already had some contact with consultants from various companies... One consultant informed me that his company generally requires a financing confirmation with a guarantee certificate from the bank of the builder covering at least 70% of the contract sum! Thanks to the posts here in the forum, I was at least sensitized to this issue and possible risks (e.g., payments despite defects or services not rendered) and would like to find out,
a) whether the clauses mentioned below are among those that are advised against
b) whether such clauses are now standard (after the relevant Federal Court of Justice ruling)
c) or whether I should be "concerned" about having been with the "right construction company"
For example, the guarantee certificate states among other things:
"Builder instructs bank to transfer to construction company according to the following payment schedule (percentages according to construction progress follow)"
"Builder's bank assumes the suretyship for all payment obligations incumbent on the builder as a primary debtor, waiving the objection of prior enforcement..."
"Bank of the builder waives the objection of contestability and set-off, provided the builder’s right of contestation / counterclaim is neither undisputed nor legally established..."
What is to be made of this? Are such formulations common? Is this an assignment of claims??
Thanks for your opinions!!!
Regards
"the Newcomer"
Project 2012