New construction according to the 2016 Energy Saving Ordinance no longer possible without a ventilation/exhaust system?

  • Erstellt am 2017-02-22 13:53:19

Alex85

2017-02-23 09:47:30
  • #1
It can be seen that laws and subsidies are effective in enforcing technical measures. However, they do not change minds and habits, or do so only very slowly.
 

Nordlys

2017-02-23 10:52:49
  • #2
Alex, and that is a good thing. They, those in Berlin and elsewhere, are not supposed to educate us, but only to ensure security, law, and order. We can live on our own.
 

ypg

2017-02-23 15:18:32
  • #3
Please back to the topic... KNX can be discussed elsewhere

Brief regards
 

Iktinos

2017-02-23 17:57:10
  • #4

I did not claim that a controlled residential ventilation system is mandatory. I wrote that it cannot be done without it, and this becomes clear when looking at the requirements of the KfW. Hopefully, the different calculation models on the path to a subsidized house will disappear with the introduction of the Building Energy Act.

The OP wants to build a massive KFW 55 house but leaves open how he envisions the envelope of his massive new building. Usually, either a wood pellet or biomass heating system or a heat pump is required. Most decide, due to the costs for a heat pump, usually an air-water heat pump. This choice alone is not sufficient to achieve eligibility for subsidies. More insulation (also below the foundation slab) must be installed, possibly a solar system for domestic hot water, not infrequently a better type of brick (in monolithic construction), and if a basement is planned, the costs increase substantially again. At the end of this list of measures, the new building is so airtight that it would be negligent to forgo a controlled residential ventilation system. In that case, one might as well opt for a controlled residential ventilation system (in the example, a combination of air-water heat pump + controlled residential ventilation), which is cheaper overall.

I would not do without ventilation in a modern new building but would also not want to build a KfW subsidized house. The effort is out of proportion to the expected savings in operating costs. Users of KfW subsidies like to suppress that it is not about promoting their personal project or conserving resources, but solely about putting additional money into the market. The beneficiaries are, above all, the manufacturers of insulation materials. The financiers support this covert economic subsidy because it reduces their liability risk. The sellers benefit because it puts more commission into their cash register.

Anyone who absolutely wants to build a KfW 55 house is wise to hire an independent energy consultant — one who is not brought in on the recommendation of their general contractor/contractor/builder. Then the confirmation of KfW 55 after completion of the construction measure will also work.
 

ypg

2017-02-23 19:25:08
  • #5
Your KNX topic has been moved and can be found here:
 

Similar topics
01.09.2016Is Smarthome KNX automation possible based on the floor plan?81
15.10.2020Controlled residential ventilation manufacturer selection - How to approach?43
18.05.2021KfW energy calculation with cooling heat pump22
08.10.2021Air-water heat pump combined with underfloor heating does not work properly65
25.05.2022Air-to-water heat pump + underfloor heating + controlled residential ventilation with heat recovery - individually room differently temperature controllable?10

Oben