Michael M.
2021-10-25 14:58:02
- #1
Hello dear forum,
I have been reading here for several months now and have a concrete concern where I would like to draw on collective wisdom.
We have purchased a building plot on a slope for a single-family house. The access to the house is on the north side and the future garden on the south side. The height difference within the building area is about 2.7 m (~1 floor). There is a development plan for the building area from 2005. Since the requirements were so strict and offered the builders little design flexibility, and therefore the plots could not be sold, the development plan was amended in 2011. Among other things, it was added that flat roofs are now exceptionally permitted:
[*
Almost all building plots in the residential area are now developed. Of the existing 12 buildings, 6 have flat roofs. We also want to build with a flat roof. Now we have a neighbor who had already built before the development plan amendment. At that time, flat roofs were not allowed and not even mentioned as an exception in the development plan. Our neighbor now wants to prevent us from building our house with a flat roof. He demands that we build with a one-sided or two-sided pitched roof, just as he did back then. Due to the extremely low eaves height of 3.75 m, this is not an option for us. With a flat roof, only the compliance with the ridge height of max. 7.25 m applies.
I am particularly interested in what means are at his disposal and whether he actually has a chance to prevent the project. We are especially unsettled by this approach because the other neighbor house of our neighbor is also a house with a flat roof and our neighbor did not oppose that.
I would be very happy about your assessment.
Thanks and best regards
Michael
I have been reading here for several months now and have a concrete concern where I would like to draw on collective wisdom.
We have purchased a building plot on a slope for a single-family house. The access to the house is on the north side and the future garden on the south side. The height difference within the building area is about 2.7 m (~1 floor). There is a development plan for the building area from 2005. Since the requirements were so strict and offered the builders little design flexibility, and therefore the plots could not be sold, the development plan was amended in 2011. Among other things, it was added that flat roofs are now exceptionally permitted:
[*
- Roof types
[LIST]
[*]With a floor area ratio of 0.3, the following roof types are permitted:
[LIST]
[*]at least two-sided pitched roofs (GD), such as gable roof, staggered gable roof, hip roof
[*]one-sided pitched roofs with a roof pitch of 5-12°
[*]Flat roofs are exceptionally permitted.
[*
- ...
[*]Building heights measured from single-family house
[*]Eaves height: max. 3.75 m
[*]Ridge height: max. 7.25 m
Almost all building plots in the residential area are now developed. Of the existing 12 buildings, 6 have flat roofs. We also want to build with a flat roof. Now we have a neighbor who had already built before the development plan amendment. At that time, flat roofs were not allowed and not even mentioned as an exception in the development plan. Our neighbor now wants to prevent us from building our house with a flat roof. He demands that we build with a one-sided or two-sided pitched roof, just as he did back then. Due to the extremely low eaves height of 3.75 m, this is not an option for us. With a flat roof, only the compliance with the ridge height of max. 7.25 m applies.
I am particularly interested in what means are at his disposal and whether he actually has a chance to prevent the project. We are especially unsettled by this approach because the other neighbor house of our neighbor is also a house with a flat roof and our neighbor did not oppose that.
I would be very happy about your assessment.
Thanks and best regards
Michael