Development plan deviations - the neighbors do not want to agree

Hello everyone,

there have been many questions and information here. Thanks for that.

I will try to answer a few questions.
The entire building area is located on a slope. The street has its lowest point directly in front of our house. That worries us a bit, we don’t want water in the house. That might go well for the next 10 years, but maybe the 11th year will bring problems. (Drainage also does not inspire 100% confidence)
We are also located on a curve, so you drive straight towards the house and would be at the level of the windows on the ground floor. We don’t necessarily think that looks nice. Especially if the house next door is built “normally.”

For each building plot, there is a separate single-family house indicated as üNN. Not in relation to the street.
You wouldn’t have to dig a big hole, since the property is at the house. But you would have to excavate more.

The setback distances are observed. Even if three times as much distance were required, we would adhere to it.

I don’t have the text from the development plan here right now. But the height of the single-family house entered in the development plan is described along the outer wall up to the outer surface of the roof. There are no other points limiting us in terms of height in the development plan.

I do not have the text from the development plan here at the moment.

If you expect help from us, you will probably have to provide understandable information. And since your explanations are hard to understand, it would be most useful to make the original textual provisions and an excerpt from the graphical part of the development plan accessible to us, ideally also the site plan for the building application with the existing heights. I'll try my luck without this information:

However, the height of the single-family house entered in the development plan is described along the outer wall up to the outer skin of the roof.

My translation program renders this as: The development plan sets a ground floor floor level relative to normal zero and an eaves height relative to the ground floor floor level.

No further points that limit us in height are included in the development plan.

Tolerances are not provided. A maximum ridge or building height is not set. From your other threads I gather:

We have already been to the building authority of the city. There they see no concerns.

We would like to increase our knee wall somewhat. But the building authority wants to reject that.

An exemption from the set single-family house is being considered, an exceeding of the maximum knee wall height is not approved. Now my questions: Did I translate correctly? Is the wish for a higher knee wall off the table? What exactly was discussed with the building authority? Only increasing the single-family house, or also the eaves height? Is there anything in writing?

we discussed our building plans with our neighbors last week.

Was that the wish, the recommendation, or the requirement of the building authority?

I wouldn't want the entrance to be below street level either.....especially because of the water.....

But if you don't become taller than the neighbors next to you then there is no problem for those behind/next to you? If you adhere to the restriction and stay below the street level, I understand there is no height limit? The neighbor shouldn't care where your OKFB starts, or did I overlook something?

The local situation is hard for me to imagine, but the fact that the lowest lying plot in the development area also has the house standing the lowest is not surprising. And in the case of a hillside location: in the sense of: street at the top - plot sloping away from the street, the unfavorable building situation arises in the flow direction of the rainwater. If the side distances are that large, can’t the house be shifted to improve the situation? in connection with a side entrance or something similar?