Minimum scope of services Architect + structural engineer possibly self-performance?

  • Erstellt am 2011-05-01 23:18:47

m2thearius

2011-05-01 23:18:47
  • #1
Hello,

we would like to have a 140 sqm house (+ basement) built from solid Poroton bricks, on a slight slope, as a shell construction and do the interior finishing ourselves (budget approx. 250K€).

We want to keep the costs as low as possible. This also includes the costs for the architect and structural engineer.

Questions:

1. Which services should I take advantage of at least from a rational point of view?
2. Which services can I perform on my own (cost calculation, interior planning, etc.)?
3. Are there any other useful tips on how to keep the architect’s costs low?
 

Bauexperte

2011-05-02 11:01:13
  • #2
Hello,


Only the architect is authorized to submit, so he must prepare all relevant documents for the building application and, after your countersignature, submit them to the building authority. You also won’t want to build without a structural engineer, as he, among other things, is responsible for the foundation based on the soil report and, for example, the thermal insulation certification.

After the building permit is granted, soil report and structural analysis are prepared, you can basically – provided you trust yourself – manage the construction alone and coordinate your ongoing costs according to measures and wishes.

Kind regards
 

m2thearius

2011-05-02 11:44:24
  • #3
Ok thanks for the answer.

What costs in % of the construction sum can I expect for the mentioned tasks of the structural engineer and architect with standard basic equipment?

I am confident in cost controlling and calculation during or before the construction phase.

Is it advisable for the architect/structural engineer or even an external expert to regularly inspect the progress of the shell construction? Or can I "blindly" trust the general contractor I commission for the shell construction?
 

€uro

2011-05-02 12:37:04
  • #4
Hello,

Not only the costs for the architect, structural engineer etc. need to be optimized, but the total costs.
With a high proportion of self-performed work, the construction method alone can have a significant influence. Many self-builders put the cart before the horse. The interior finishing, especially the building services, requires considerable expertise. In addition, there are numerous competing demands from the various trades. The layman is quickly overwhelmed. Furthermore, there are various safety-relevant requirements. Without precise dimensioning/planning, e.g. of the heating, hot water preparation and ventilation, and sufficient support during the construction phase, the planned "savings" will quickly turn into a loss-making business.
In addition, the corresponding specialist contractor declarations are required for the building completion notification.

Best regards
 

E.Curb

2011-05-02 12:46:42
  • #5




What about planning/site management? And by planning I do not mean the approval planning (building permit), but the planning of execution/details.



Definitely. Ideally someone who not only takes over construction supervision but is also responsible for site management. You save yourself a lot of trouble if you have someone who knows at all times during the construction phase what is going on at the site and tells how it should be executed.

You should not save money on planning and site management. There are certainly other things to cut costs on.

Best regards
 

m2thearius

2011-05-02 13:29:27
  • #6

For heating and sanitation, my girlfriend's father is a specialist. He has been working for a local company for nearly 30 years and has already offered several times to take care of these parts for us. This would mean 2 major areas of concern less that I would have to worry about.


I have absolutely no idea about construction management and planning. I definitely need a specialist here, but which one?

Can I trust the company that I commission with the shell construction and basement (they will certainly assign a construction manager)? Or should the architect also come by every 4 weeks? Or is an external building surveyor better?

What is understood by the individual architectural services? As far as I have understood as a building expert, item 4 must necessarily be done by the architect. And partly item 8 should also be done. What is meant by the rest? I already have very clear ideas about the appearance, size, and floor plans of the house, so what else is needed?


1 - Basic evaluation Max 3 %
%

2 - Preliminary planning Max 7 %
%

3 - Design planning Max 11 %
%

4 - Approval planning Max 6 %
%

5 - Execution planning Max 25 %
%

6 - Preparation of awarding contracts Max 10 %
%

7 - Assistance with awarding contracts Max 4 %
%

8 - Site supervision Max 31 %
%

9 - Site support, documentation Max 3 %
%
 

Similar topics
11.08.2009Interior finishing costs - total cost planning12
14.11.2011Shell construction still this year15
15.01.2013Soil survey report for house construction10
29.10.2013Property reserved, construction financing plan, architect/building permit application21
13.11.2013Do you absolutely need an architect?10
30.01.2014Architect's cost estimation15
27.05.2015Does an external chimney have to go down to the basement?12
07.05.2016Buying a shell construction - Experiences21
03.10.2016Single-family house, hillside location, basement half residential/useful area - expensive shell construction?15
17.10.2019Costs of soil assessment / geotechnical investigations34
04.08.2017Building application or building notification15
06.09.2017Add a wind catch later to the shell construction17
06.12.2017Constantly making the same mistakes in the building application - stupidity or intent?44
11.01.2018Partition wall thickness for duplex house. Structural engineer plans 17.5 cm14
14.03.2019City villa with approx. 200 sqm - without basement. Please provide feedback50
29.01.2019Responsibility of the architect in case of KfW interest and further matters148
27.08.2018New building shell construction selection: Choose a company or architects?52

Oben