Marten in the sloping roof of the new building? Construction defect?

  • Erstellt am 2016-01-26 15:17:49

EveundGerd

2016-01-27 10:14:53
  • #1


I was probably too late.
 

lastdrop

2016-01-27 11:44:47
  • #2
No, that makes sense to bring up the made, constructive suggestions here again. Maybe the OP is reading along ...

In summary, in my opinion:
- Check where the animal (whatever came in)
- See if a gap can be found that can be closed
- Possibly have a roofer take a look
- Contact a forester
 

Bauexperte

2016-01-27 12:28:38
  • #3
Hello,


Many factors came together here that argued for the temporary ban of the original poster; if I had been online at that particular time yesterday, the original poster would not have gotten away with it unscathed either. And no, "loan shark" is not an accepted job title for a bank clerk. Not every bank clerk is automatically an exploiter or usurer, which is roughly the equivalent of "loan shark."


Do you really "have" to think that? I see respectful interaction with each other - especially online - increasingly on the decline; the internet is anonymous, manners in my opinion a relic of real-life language. Spiegel Online recently published an interesting report on this.


With your opinion, you are then in growing company if I look at it these days. Things are not being critically questioned, but - as in your current response - the cause of the scandal is being defended. Or what do you want to be understood by "Cyberbullying in the Forum"?

Yes, there are certainly worse nuisances; nevertheless, this does not mean that there may be a lack of mutual respect here - weighed against each other. This forum is growing continuously; I am firmly convinced that this is also due to the basic tone of this forum. Basically, it applies to everyone that the netiquette must be observed; whoever does not like that is given the opportunity to reflect on their behavior here or is welcome to take their virtual hat and leave.

Rhenish greetings
 

arubau36

2016-01-27 17:40:08
  • #4
My last comment on this thread: This is a house building forum and everyone should be taken seriously, no matter how many times questions come up..and I wouldn’t let myself get emotionally involved so quickly...how often do you hear about relationships on the internet, even though people have never met in person, or bullying on Facebook, etc....and "Geldhai" is, in my eyes, the mildest form...well... luckily I don’t know any of you personally...that’s what the internet is good for...just not having to look someone in the face and be confronted with the truth. Oh... how relationship-oriented the internet is ... Great too that there are good tips for the marten problem. I wish "Klaus" much success and goodbye ... I’m going to be around people now.
 

Bauexperte

2016-01-28 00:42:49
  • #5


I am sorry, but I really do not understand what you want to tell me. Could you kindly give me a hint?

Rhineland greetings
 

f-pNo

2016-01-28 13:14:06
  • #6


The OP was also taken seriously at the beginning.
The first comparison with the pigeons only means: "That's just how nature is. If a wild animal causes damage (in any form), you cannot immediately blame the builder for it. Whether it is pigeons (probably the smallest damage), woodpeckers or martens."
He probably wouldn't hold his car manufacturer responsible either if a marten rampages in the engine compartment.



Personally, as a banker, I also felt disturbed by the term "money shark." This term is inherently negative and refers to someone who stops at nothing for money. I think this is indeed an insult.

Do you think that the little cashier at the checkout makes millions? Or the person handling your loan? Or the controller / accountant / risk management employee / payment transactions staff / back office employee / etc.?
I also get annoyed when people speak in general of THE BANKERS who earn millions and throw wild parties. Why I am bothered by this: It is a small minority of investment bankers (and only a small part of those) who earn millions and have thrown such parties. Every "normal" banker shakes their head at this and could vomit – because they find it impossible as well and are lumped together with them.

It is the same as if you portray all house building companies as fraudsters, call every doctor a charlatan/botcher producing malpractice one after another, say every IT guy is a hacker, and every baker mixes sawdust into the bread dough.

Last but not least:
If you were to meet in person and look him in the face, you would probably meet a nice person with whom you could have a good conversation.

Look at the number of his posts here and the number of endorsements. This should show, in my opinion, that he is engaged here and helps as much as possible. He has not shown any provocative/offensive behavior here.

However, I agree with you on one thing: At some point one should focus again on the original question – if participants are still interested in doing so.
 
Oben