ypg
2020-09-30 23:24:06
- #1
Regarding 3.: You are wrong, @ypg.
Explanation above.
What is 3.? The OP did not assign any numbers.
But if this applies:
Nothing definite is known yet.
Then mine can only be wrong
Regarding 3.: You are wrong, @ypg.
Explanation above.
Nothing definite is known yet.
The question about the property tax. Let's see from when the new law will apply. Currently, your answer is at least still wrong.What is 3.? The OP did not assign any numbers.
Thanks for the answers! Regarding point 2: that was a hypothetical consideration, in case for example due to government spatial planning it is decided in decades that an area should be cleared for a new train line or highway, or if thanks to a breakthrough in anti-aging research I should live over 100 years.1. That depends on the MEA (co-ownership shares). You need to find out if the larger plots receive more. However, it probably won't be enough for you to influence votes. 2. Why and by whom should the houses be demolished? 3. I'm not sure. 4. Additional costs are based on living area. 5. End house: only one wall-to-wall neighbor on one side, windows possible on 3 sides, where the 2nd neighbor would be is often a garden, purchase price probably higher
It is an exclusive use area.How is the property divided? Separate ownership or exclusive use area? Many greetings Gabriele