KFN house without ventilation system - Experiences

  • Erstellt am 2025-02-02 11:53:58

wiltshire

2025-02-03 09:26:13
  • #1
Thank you. Then my error in thinking was here. I was probably too focused on the active variant due to the wording "waiver for financial reasons."
 

Arauki11

2025-02-03 10:42:22
  • #2
Each "side" explains its respective point of view on things and ideally even learns something in the process. I myself have described my perspective in the essential context of my own life/living concept, with which I currently feel very comfortable. A reader can draw their own conclusions from this; insofar, I find the informational content in this message lacking and can do little with it: In my opinion, life in earthen houses is extremely pleasant, even though I do not live that way myself; in fact, I could imagine liking it. Why earthen construction should necessarily become a "bunker" eludes me, because "bunkers" are more associated with the building material concrete, which in turn probably fits better with some single-family homes here. In that respect, earthen construction is precisely the opposite of what was expressed here; ergo, it seems people do not know it themselves. I understood the statement from to mean that it is presented THAT WAY FOR HIM and his living situation and that he still feels comfortable in his house. This neither means that one has to do it the same way nor that it would only be sensible that way. As is often the case, both or many ways are possible if one does not disregard the CONTEXT. Why should someone who does not claim funding read this? I would agree with that as well because in most cases young families are building and similar requirements arise from this. Older applicants, and I count myself among them, can sometimes make decisions for themselves that deviate from the standard, as they only need to orient themselves in their living spaces. For the "usual" family, it is simply inconceivable to live in a house consisting of basically only one large room. I still find it interesting to include these detailed points of view here to get a more comprehensive picture of something. Everyone may still decide freely. I just too often read of a "must" simply because it is sensible or only appears to be so for many. This is also true for underfloor heating, heat pumps, etc., which are generally of course sensible, but a nice house is also possible without that and sometimes even nicer. What matters is that one explains the background of their point of view and does not just present their position as the only possible truth. Not everyone is willing to align their house according to the Kfw.
 

11ant

2025-02-04 01:40:44
  • #3


So you have an architect’s plan up to and including performance phase 4, meaning submission of the building application. What construction method and energy efficiency level was planned, and has the application already been submitted?
And am I interpreting your wish correctly that you now think, “For the price of the controlled residential ventilation, you could have planned bigger or afforded huge tiles / golden faucets or something like that” and “wash me, but don’t get me wet” (meaning on the one hand, you want subsidy money for KfW300 / KfN, but on the other hand, you don’t want to spend anything on the actually associated controlled residential ventilation)?
How things proceed after performance phase 4, I have already mentioned and explained multiple times: you pay tuition fees for a “saved” performance phase 5, since you are only allowed to build with the approved building application documents, but not build beyond that. The most wasted money for planning is in the case where you had your house, for example, planned in the building energy standard in stone (caliber 365 from “whatever”), but now want it built as EH40 – possibly also at the best price with a wood builder – and now first have to shove around a large pack of textures all around.
 

Similar topics
01.03.2017Controlled residential ventilation - Yes or No?!31
03.03.2012Position controlled residential ventilation in the underground basement?16
09.04.2012Decentralized vs. Central Controlled Residential Ventilation? Points for KfW House Calculation20
26.07.2012Ventilation with controlled residential ventilation system14
05.07.2012Controlled residential ventilation - yes or no14
24.12.2012Is controlled residential ventilation in this case sensible or not?10
27.02.2013Controlled residential ventilation or regulated air - experiences?14
20.12.2013New underfloor heating instead of radiators and controlled residential ventilation; yes or no?15
25.08.2014Decentralized residential ventilation, exhaust air heat pump - experiences?10
25.05.2014When do you notice that the controlled residential ventilation system is working?18
24.06.2014Decentralized controlled residential ventilation so expensive?38
21.07.2014Installation of controlled residential ventilation - in the ceiling or outside?20
01.08.2014Water-bearing wood stove (supplement to the air-water heat pump and controlled residential ventilation with heat recovery)?10
03.06.2015Controlled residential ventilation with heat recovery --- a confusing maze?12
06.11.2015Set controlled residential ventilation KFW 70 with underfloor heating18
26.04.2020Are phases 1-4 sufficient? Or additionally 5?11
22.05.2022Are performance phases 1-3 with the architect and lump sum offer somehow disadvantageous?19
18.01.2023Architect performance phase 1-4 - Which documents are required?33

Oben