Bauexperte
2012-09-29 19:59:01
- #1
Hello,
in advance -
Radiant heating in the form of a natural stone heater is, for me, the best form of heating. Healthy, pleasant, unique installation cost and no maintenance or follow-up costs. In combination with photovoltaic systems almost perfect ... also in old buildings; always provided it is massive building fabric.
That is not true! Such blanket statements - I always wonder where they come from ... and spread unpleasantly across the country
I hope the system of your Austrian neighbors; all other systems are third or fourth choice.
In my opinion you won’t get there, because ...
... you want to have a single-family house built in timber frame construction; however, the natural stone heater works like the sun. All solid objects are heated, including your body, and "store" - for a certain period of time and dependent on massive building fabric - the heat produced in this way. The savings therefore result from the natural stone heater itself and the building fabric. Timber frame cannot provide that - the material, described layman’s terms, has no storage potential -, that is why I also think the worst case with you will be higher than €1,800.00/year, if you opt for this system.
The natural stone heater in combination with photovoltaics is unbeatable there - healthy and affordable - where it is installed in a massive constructed house. By the way, it also pays off without photovoltaics, if the heat pump tariff of the utility company is applied and it is used from a KfW 70 - or higher efficiency house.
Kind regards
in advance -
Radiant heating in the form of a natural stone heater is, for me, the best form of heating. Healthy, pleasant, unique installation cost and no maintenance or follow-up costs. In combination with photovoltaic systems almost perfect ... also in old buildings; always provided it is massive building fabric.
... where the annual performance factor 3.5 is usually never maintained and actually goes down to 2.8. (Electricity guzzler).
That is not true! Such blanket statements - I always wonder where they come from ... and spread unpleasantly across the country
I have a timber frame house U value 0.14 + triple glazing, the building envelope reaches KfW 55. approx. living area 130m². Now I had a consultant who recommends a natural stone heater, since the building requires little energy.
I hope the system of your Austrian neighbors; all other systems are third or fourth choice.
... If the actual consumption were 60 kWh/m² per year you would end up with 8500 kWh without hot water. so 1800 Euro electricity (that is expensive)
In my opinion you won’t get there, because ...
Is that an oversimplified calculation or does it add up?!
... you want to have a single-family house built in timber frame construction; however, the natural stone heater works like the sun. All solid objects are heated, including your body, and "store" - for a certain period of time and dependent on massive building fabric - the heat produced in this way. The savings therefore result from the natural stone heater itself and the building fabric. Timber frame cannot provide that - the material, described layman’s terms, has no storage potential -, that is why I also think the worst case with you will be higher than €1,800.00/year, if you opt for this system.
The natural stone heater in combination with photovoltaics is unbeatable there - healthy and affordable - where it is installed in a massive constructed house. By the way, it also pays off without photovoltaics, if the heat pump tariff of the utility company is applied and it is used from a KfW 70 - or higher efficiency house.
Kind regards