Is financing feasible? Stuttgart's Speckgürtel

  • Erstellt am 2020-07-08 22:00:06

Unsure

2020-07-10 13:32:32
  • #1
There are unavoidable risks and avoidable risks. Not much more needs to be said about that. The rest is as everyone thinks.
 

Ötzi Ötztaler

2020-07-10 13:51:30
  • #2
Don't let the swarm painters drive you crazy. And the thing is not even close to being stitched on the edge, but actually very solid. I would do it. Nevertheless, in the first years better to make special repayments than a second vacation, but your previous saving habits make me suspect that you already see it that way. Good luck with the construction!
 

Maschi33

2020-07-10 14:37:19
  • #3
Very solid? Is that supposed to be a joke now? What exactly is very solid about a three-quarter million loan with 7k income? The equity capital is just enough for a little more than the incidental costs. So I think that’s a (price) shelf too high.
 

HilfeHilfe

2020-07-10 14:39:09
  • #4
It's okay. I do not question the industry. Could be good or bad.
 

BackSteinGotik

2020-07-10 23:26:49
  • #5


Well, it's interesting. At least numerically. While financing of €450,000 with a €4,500 income was often considered impossible in the cases presented here, €700,000 with a €7,000 income is rather appropriate here. The factor is identical, and in both cases it would be rather at the upper end of the scale, with 100 times the monthly income. Still, it is doable. The high savings rate, together with the rent, shows that over 30 years the sum would have to be repaid with about €2,400 monthly. In all examples here, it is anyway the case that nothing works anymore without two earners.
 

Gelbwoschdd

2020-07-11 00:28:09
  • #6
That’s nonsense. 1. Already €170K!!! of equity has been saved here, 2. a rate of €2,200 is calculated whereas with the €450K financing with €4,500 income and little to no equity, rates between €1,200 and €1,600 are often indicated, which would leave around €3K for everything else and here still well over €4K 3. Here a better interest rate is certainly achieved due to the €170K than with the mentioned 100% and more financings. For one, absolutely nothing must go wrong, for the other, nothing major. In my eyes, that’s already a difference.
 

Similar topics
04.11.2009Taking a loan for equity financing?19
08.07.2013Does the repayment fit the income? - Is financing feasible this way?14
15.11.2013Is financing with this income realistic? Experiences?11
17.06.2014House purchase planned at the beginning of 2015 - No equity41
05.10.2014Building a house without equity26
16.02.2015Financing with equity15
17.06.2015Building a house without equity or how does one proceed?14
02.02.2016It doesn't work without equity - experience!109
27.06.2018Is financing with low equity sensible?19
14.04.2016Home financing without equity. Is the financing amount too high?25
14.05.2016House purchase: Financing (with/without equity)24
15.05.2016Own home - Planning the property / Financing with income ok?22
25.05.2016Financing without equity - Repayment / Interest63
20.06.2016Experiences with income from self-employed individuals in financing?12
04.07.2016What to do with a lot of equity?17
15.07.2016Planning to build, is it realistic? Young + Equity53
29.08.2016Can we afford this? Income / Investment / Equity131
30.08.2016Construction financing 40,000€ equity, tied to a condominium29
10.01.2017Construction financing without equity capital, but with other liabilities36
06.05.2024Financial planning for new construction with good income and little equity81

Oben