Wastl
2014-10-07 13:48:29
- #1
Says who?I haven't read such nonsense for a long time. Those who can no longer afford more than a 3-room apartment also cannot afford more if the single person would not build.
Did I say that? I think you misunderstand me.If I continue your thought, someone whose children have moved out and whose spouse dies must urgently leave the property and hand over the house to exactly the family that could not afford a single-family home. Tsk!
Yes, they need living space. But do they need a house? Is it sensible to acquire a house just because you have too much money lying around? How do you get envy from that? Why should I be jealous? I stick to the statement: Why should a single person have a house? Just because they have money lying around? If they plan a family, or need rooms for hobbies, or whatever - okay. But just because you have money lying around, acquiring a house is not sensible. For me, the advice: "Sure, you have €450k lying around - buy yourself a house" is not sensible. The advice should be: "If you need a house for xxx reasons, then buy the house." Owning a house just to get rid of money is not sensible to me. But to each their own,...A single person also needs living space. And they have the right to self-determination. In your sentence, envy can be read.