Rowingpartner
2019-08-17 10:56:59
- #1
Hello community,
I am currently facing a problem and hope you can give me some guidance! Here is the situation:
I am currently renovating a four-unit house with a general contractor in order to rent it out afterward. I will not be living in it myself. There is a general contractor agreement (with a fixed price) with contractor XY in which all executions were specified. Among other things, it was also stipulated that all interior walls are to be built in solid construction (calcium silicate or aerated concrete).
The house is currently in an advanced state of construction. However, some partition walls still need to be installed in the attic. Two rooms will be created there: a bedroom and a study/storage/walk-in closet or whatever. The contractor now wants to build these partition walls in the attic using lightweight construction (stud framework, insulation, etc.) and not in solid construction as stated in the contract. However, I insist that it be executed in aerated concrete as outlined in the contract.
Of course, I can imagine why the contractor would prefer to build it in lightweight construction, since the costs for a lightweight wall can be significantly lower than for a solid wall. The contractor claims that the lightweight wall is much better than the aerated concrete wall. This discussion went back and forth for about two weeks and I have continued to say that I want a solid wall. The contractor didn’t seem very agreeable and kept trying to persuade me to choose the other wall. So far without success.
In a phone call yesterday, I was told that it is structurally not possible to place a wall in aerated concrete there at all and that therefore they must use the lightweight wall. However, I consider this absolutely wrong since aerated concrete is very light on the one hand and the ceiling below is also a massive concrete slab. The spans there are also absolutely small. Of course, one would have to look very closely at the static calculations at this point, but I’ll skip that now.
For me, the solid wall is simply clearly much more high-quality and better. Just thinking about the sound of a lightweight wall when knocking on it, I definitely want the solid wall. On the other hand, I can of course also be relaxed since I will not live in the apartments myself...
I would like to hear your opinions on this. Which type of wall would you prefer? Are there advantages or disadvantages? Is it maybe not so bad to install a lightweight wall after all?
I look forward to feedback!

I am currently facing a problem and hope you can give me some guidance! Here is the situation:
I am currently renovating a four-unit house with a general contractor in order to rent it out afterward. I will not be living in it myself. There is a general contractor agreement (with a fixed price) with contractor XY in which all executions were specified. Among other things, it was also stipulated that all interior walls are to be built in solid construction (calcium silicate or aerated concrete).
The house is currently in an advanced state of construction. However, some partition walls still need to be installed in the attic. Two rooms will be created there: a bedroom and a study/storage/walk-in closet or whatever. The contractor now wants to build these partition walls in the attic using lightweight construction (stud framework, insulation, etc.) and not in solid construction as stated in the contract. However, I insist that it be executed in aerated concrete as outlined in the contract.
Of course, I can imagine why the contractor would prefer to build it in lightweight construction, since the costs for a lightweight wall can be significantly lower than for a solid wall. The contractor claims that the lightweight wall is much better than the aerated concrete wall. This discussion went back and forth for about two weeks and I have continued to say that I want a solid wall. The contractor didn’t seem very agreeable and kept trying to persuade me to choose the other wall. So far without success.
In a phone call yesterday, I was told that it is structurally not possible to place a wall in aerated concrete there at all and that therefore they must use the lightweight wall. However, I consider this absolutely wrong since aerated concrete is very light on the one hand and the ceiling below is also a massive concrete slab. The spans there are also absolutely small. Of course, one would have to look very closely at the static calculations at this point, but I’ll skip that now.
For me, the solid wall is simply clearly much more high-quality and better. Just thinking about the sound of a lightweight wall when knocking on it, I definitely want the solid wall. On the other hand, I can of course also be relaxed since I will not live in the apartments myself...
I would like to hear your opinions on this. Which type of wall would you prefer? Are there advantages or disadvantages? Is it maybe not so bad to install a lightweight wall after all?
I look forward to feedback!