Intercepting property, who has to bear the costs?

Sounds like no very smart plan. Also very expensive.

What exactly is stated in the B Plan? Does it possibly say that the floor slabs must be centered according to the terrain and that the terrain beyond the floor slab and terrace must not be altered? So that in fact not three meters but only 1.5 can be achieved? And what are you really doing? Are you just filling up and is the other just digging deep? Questions! K.

When we bought our building plot, the neighbors had long finished their planning. When the Bie* Zenk*** sign was up there, we immediately put a note on it with our numbers and that they should get in touch. At that time, it was not yet clear what and how we were going to do it, and their planning was finished. Hätte hätte Herrentoilette. That doesn’t help now either. We are already working with split level to compensate for part of the slope. Still, we will have to add some fill, that’s just how it is. But I can’t explain the whole project now, that would be too much here. Karsten, the development plan only states that excavations and fills due to the terrain topography are to be accepted. Specifically up to a height of max. 1.50 - if you want to make your terrain higher or lower, a distance of one meter must be maintained between the individual retaining walls. So you can staircase your entire property if you think that’s cool. From our building plot, I can see people who have done that... The one-meter distance between the retaining walls, according to fresh information from the building authority (this morning), explicitly does NOT apply to terrain modellings at the boundaries. Here we could therefore put retaining walls directly next to each other. It would only be about 3 meters at the highest point, then slope down to about 2 in total. I can attach a photo for clarification tomorrow if interested. It’s just hilly land here...

If everything is ok, §1 applies: everyone pays their share. Only the downstream owner will be surprised, as they will then be sitting in front of the [Eigernordwand].

Only the person living below will be surprised, since they are sitting right in front of the Eigernordwand.

That is correct. You can admire it in full form right next door. Above, 1.50 meters of L-shaped stones plus 1.50 meters of metal fence with black foil woven in (...) and then the person below has dug in another meter PLUS they only kept the 3-meter building limit. So they are sitting with a 3-meter distance at a 4-meter high eyesore that protrudes over their entire ground floor width. For us, it’s a bit milder; the future neighbors’ house is set back 6 meters from the spot with the greatest displacement. And we certainly won’t put such a hideous monstrosity of a fence on it. But yes, for those living below it’s less pleasant than for those above. I’m somewhat glad that after us there’s only the street. We are on top. Probably that’s also why it was so damn expensive.

We also built on the slope. But had to offset everything to prevent the worst. So I am 1.2 up in the front and about 1.0 m in at the back. The one behind us is similar.