Induction stove vs. "normal" cooktop

  • Erstellt am 2022-05-18 01:32:37

Scout**

2022-05-18 12:38:20
  • #1
The most pragmatic solution is probably to replace the cooktop with a halogen cooktop. And if you really like it and need it, you can get a single induction plate separately for occasional use and to keep a distance. It then mostly just sits in a drawer or in the basement...
 

sysrun80

2022-05-18 15:18:21
  • #2


That would be just as clever as radiation blockers for mobile phones - and then wonder why the reception is so bad...
 

maulwurf79

2022-05-18 21:40:39
  • #3
Induction cooktops are highly problematic from a radiation protection perspective. Induction cooktops are only tested with standard cooking pots. However, in reality, various containers with different fill levels, lids, and stirring devices are used, which causes the radiation behavior to change completely unpredictably depending on which antenna (pot) is placed how on it, and the user can be exposed to very high radiation doses that can also act locally on the user. In my kitchen, something like that will never be installed. If anything, at most a gas stove.
 

maulwurf79

2022-05-18 21:54:28
  • #4
By the way, this did not originate from me but was said by an employee of the [Bundesamtes für Strahlenschutz] in a broadcast of [Deutschlandfunks] on the topic.
 

Benutzer200

2022-05-18 22:50:48
  • #5

But it must be an individual opinion and not the official one:


And at SWR the employee says:
 

kbt09

2022-05-18 23:50:46
  • #6
And just as a note .. Induction has not only existed since yesterday. First experiments and patents as early as 1900, actual widespread use since the late 70s/early 80s. So we are not talking about a new technology here, nor one without long-term experience, but quite the opposite ;).
 
Oben