Induction stove vs. "normal" cooktop

Can't we just conclude that induction is not suitable for the OP instead of giving all sorts of treatises? I'm smiling too here, but what is that supposed to achieve?

The most pragmatic solution is probably to replace the cooktop with a halogen cooktop. And if you really like it and need it, you can get a single induction plate separately for occasional use and to keep a distance. It then mostly just sits in a drawer or in the basement...

I certainly don't know of any induction cooktop that advertises reduced magnetic radiation.

That would be just as clever as radiation blockers for mobile phones - and then wonder why the reception is so bad...

Induction cooktops are highly problematic from a radiation protection perspective. Induction cooktops are only tested with standard cooking pots. However, in reality, various containers with different fill levels, lids, and stirring devices are used, which causes the radiation behavior to change completely unpredictably depending on which antenna (pot) is placed how on it, and the user can be exposed to very high radiation doses that can also act locally on the user. In my kitchen, something like that will never be installed. If anything, at most a gas stove.

By the way, this did not originate from me but was said by an employee of the [Bundesamtes für Strahlenschutz] in a broadcast of [Deutschlandfunks] on the topic.

By the way, this is not my idea but was said by an employee of the Federal Office for Radiation Protection in a Deutschlandfunk broadcast on the topic.

But it must be an individual opinion and not the official one:


And at SWR the employee says:

And just as a note .. Induction has not only existed since yesterday. First experiments and patents as early as 1900, actual widespread use since the late 70s/early 80s. So we are not talking about a new technology here, nor one without long-term experience, but quite the opposite ;).