f-pNo
2014-09-03 10:52:24
- #1
As I said:
My last post was only meant to convey that questions – even if they are very easy to answer from our perspective – are always welcome and no one should hesitate to ask them.
Important – and this should be the essential takeaway from all the posts in recent days:
For a proper answer, we also need usable information. A follow-up question from us is not harassment but is meant to serve the goal (answering the question).
However, above all, a certain "netiquette" should prevail, because nobody likes to help someone who forgets the rules of decency.
However – and I must also critically reflect on myself here – with my post #10 I may have crossed a line. But how am I supposed to clearly show someone who obviously does not know the subject matter in the slightest that their refusal to provide additional information will not lead to the goal (answering the question)? Most likely, an example from another area of life helps there the most.
My last post was only meant to convey that questions – even if they are very easy to answer from our perspective – are always welcome and no one should hesitate to ask them.
Important – and this should be the essential takeaway from all the posts in recent days:
For a proper answer, we also need usable information. A follow-up question from us is not harassment but is meant to serve the goal (answering the question).
However, above all, a certain "netiquette" should prevail, because nobody likes to help someone who forgets the rules of decency.
However – and I must also critically reflect on myself here – with my post #10 I may have crossed a line. But how am I supposed to clearly show someone who obviously does not know the subject matter in the slightest that their refusal to provide additional information will not lead to the goal (answering the question)? Most likely, an example from another area of life helps there the most.