Possible, the old link led to a post with three more links, but all of them "geoopsed". Then I tried it via the search and apparently ended up in the predecessor thread.
Also, one of the oopsing links initially (also) contained a classic semi-detached house, but with it quickly got a drive to the fraternal twin ;-)
The links oops only until you change the greatly mutated "T" in "Threads" back in the URL. I often forget to mention that weekly ;-)
I just find the ground floor much trickier than the upper floor...
The upper floor—more precisely: the sleeping or non-entrance floor, in the case of hillside houses with valley-side entrance, this principle applies only partly—is regularly divided into more and smaller rooms, which are also more focused on placement areas. It gets trickier there especially because of "door congestion" rooms: with three children and behind the door swing for each a wardrobe depth, you could easily waste a quarter of the floor area on the hallway. Once you have found a reasonably painless compromise solution (and the ground floor was already defined beforehand), there are plenty of places without walls below, resulting in columns and beams in the ground floor or light partition walls on the upper floor. Classic single-story, entrance, and living-dining-kitchen floors are significantly more tolerant in adapting to wall layouts of the "partner floor". Brutally put, such ground floors can only really be made problematic by two means: too many wishes and stubborn insistence on "one and only" stair shapes and positions.