nordanney
2021-03-22 17:20:13
- #1
No, it’s just that for many people the proportions of “life experience,” “income,” and “financing volume” fit together much better. Financially, you two alone considered are small fry. Both with meager net income, no assets, consumer credit. On top of that, very young and with family planning in mind. (exaggeratedly speaking) There are many vulnerabilities. 1. The house ends up being more expensive anyway ==> how is that supposed to be paid 2. Twins come along much earlier and one of you can/could no longer work or only 25-40%. ==> children start with K, like “K”ost a lot of money 3. After the first long-distance trip you get the taste and want to go to a different continent every year. Or an expensive hobby calls to you. ==> currently not doable, or the money is missing for the house 4. The new job is 400 km away. There your further training is truly appreciated, which you actually expected at your current job ==> not everyone likes to just sell the house like that (wouldn’t bother me, but only few think like that) etc. Just let the answers sink in. You are young and still have so much life ahead of you. There is no need to chase a wish at all costs when there are other options. You can also buy a cheap condominium and move to a house after five years. If you’re talking about a €120k land price, you live in a cheap part of Germany. Alternatively, buy a flat for €150k and repay with 10% - that’s also a form of equity creation. Simultaneously ownership. And the times of double-digit price growth will soon be over (although this was more the case with existing properties or land purchase, construction costs were decoupled and rising more slowly). Reports and analyses suggesting price declines are increasing (most recently last week from Deutsche Bank and yesterday from KfW).But it sounds here in the forum as if only rich people can afford a house, but when I look at who builds a house, I just can’t imagine that for the life of me.