Filled Poroton bricks vs aerated concrete

Take Ytong. At least you can still screw something onto it.

Use the material that your construction company is most familiar with, i.e., normally uses! Proper and clean workmanship is essential.

When it comes to wall thickness, it no longer makes a significant difference which building material is used because each has its advantages and disadvantages. Poroton is probably more expensive, and the objection to use the building material preferred by the contractor can only be agreed with!

By the way, anyone who claims they can hear the difference between a Poroton and a Porenbeton exterior wall in terms of sound insulation rating also believes that a lemon squeezer folds lemons!
Regarding sound reduction between rooms, the combination of [Porenberon] on the outside and calcium silicate brick on the inside would offer advantages because the building materials can be well combined and the calcium silicate brick is a true airborne sound absorber.

Use Ytong. At least you can still screw something onto it.

Why can't I screw anything onto Poroton bricks?

Are there any experiences with filled Poroton bricks when walls need to be dried after water damage? It's not an uncommon scenario, is it?

Use the material your construction company knows best, i.e. normally uses! Proper and clean workmanship is the be-all and end-all.

Who is stealing my mantra there?

By the way, anyone who claims they can hear the difference between a Poroton and a aerated concrete exterior wall in terms of sound insulation also believes that lemon squeezer folds lemons!

Exactly. As any pastry chef can confirm, lemons are actually rolled. Therefore, lemon squeezer only exist in Bielefeld ;-)